Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Supreme Court Allows Government To Urge Social Media Content Removal

The United States Supreme Court Building in Washington

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Biden administration, allowing federal agencies like the FBI to continue encouraging social media platforms to take down content deemed as misinformation. This decision, made by a 6-3 majority, permits the Department of Homeland Security to flag posts believed to be from foreign agents attempting to disrupt the upcoming presidential race.

The court's ruling was based on the lack of standing of the plaintiffs who challenged the administration's actions, rather than delving into the First Amendment implications of the case. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, emphasizing the need for plaintiffs to demonstrate a substantial risk of imminent harm traceable to the government.

The Biden administration has been advocating for the removal of misleading posts related to vaccines, Covid-19, and the 2020 election, citing violations of social media platforms' policies. However, critics, including Republican officials and social media users, accused the administration of coercing tech companies to silence dissenting voices through 'jawboning.'

The case raised concerns about the government's role in shaping online debates and collaborating with private entities to address societal threats. The plaintiffs alleged that the FBI pressured platforms to remove content wrongly identified as 'foreign,' even when authored by Americans.

While a federal judge in Louisiana initially blocked government communications with social media companies, the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals later narrowed the injunction to specific agencies. During oral arguments, conservative justices expressed reservations about limiting the government's ability to address problematic online content.

This case is part of a broader discussion at the intersection of the First Amendment and social media, with the court considering multiple high-profile matters. As concerns grow over foreign influence on elections through online platforms, the court's decision has significant implications for government interactions with social media in the digital age.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.