Get all your news in one place.

100’s of premium titles.
One app.

Get all your news in one place.

100’s of premium titles. One news app.

The Latest Breaking News from Glucksberg

Symmetry in Equal Protection, Fundamental Rights, and the Law of Democracy

My last post offered examples of areas where symmetry could help guide future doctrinal development. This final post on… The post Symmetry in Equal Protection, Fundamental Rights, and the Law of Democracy appeared first on Reason.com.

Department of State v. Munoz: The Sleeper ConLaw Case of the Term

Justice Barrett's majority clarifies Glucksberg, Mandel, Din, and Knauff, but Justice Sotomayor's dissent really wants to talk about Loving, Obergefell, and Dobbs.

Dobbs and the Originalists

Why originalist criticisms of Dobbs often misfire, and why criticisms *of* Dobbs's originalism often misfire too.

From analysis to the latest developments in health,
read the most diverse news in one place.

inkl

How Originalist Is the Supreme Court?

More than you might think—and it’s getting better all the time.

Sixth Circuit Stays Preliminary Injunction Against Tennessee Law Limiting Gender-Affirming Treatments for Minors

A divided panel concludes the plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail on the merits and pledges to expedite the appeal.

Texas Sets Up Test Case For Arizona v. U.S.

Can the states detain an alien based on "reasonable suspicion of illegal entry or other immigration crime"?

'A revolutionary ruling – and not just for abortion’: A Supreme Court scholar explains the impact of Dobbs

The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse 50 years of constitutional protection for the right to get an abortion is more than 200 pages long. Morgan Marietta, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, and editor of the annual SCOTUS series at Palgrave Macmillan, studies the ideas and ideology…

The Conversation

inkl

Read news from The Economist, FT, and more,
with one subscription

Conjunction Disjunction in the Dobbs Draft

Does the Glucksberg test require a right to be "fundamental" and "deeply rooted" or "fundamental" or "deeply rooted"?

Sherif Girgis on the Draft Dobbs Opinion and Its Critics

An assessment of claims that Justice Alito's draft opinion rests on historical error, provides no meaningful basis for distinguishing abortion from other unenumerated rights, and forecloses constitutional protection of the mother's life.

Legal expert: Alito draft's "fatal flaw"

Legal expert: Alito draft's "fatal flaw"

"What makes Justice Alito’s analysis truly disingenuous is its distortion of the one case on which it depends"

Commentary: A retro reading of the Constitution imperils many rights beyond abortion

As astute commentators have noted, the draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization not only seeks to overrule Roe v. Wade, but might also someday threaten other decisions like Obergefell v. Hodges, which secured the right to same-sex marriage. What might be less evident is that the draft…

Los Angeles Times

People

From analysis to the latest developments in health,
read the most diverse news in one place.

inkl

Organisations

the Supreme Court

The State Department

The Ninth Circuit

Department of State

Jackson Women Health Organization

inkl

Read news from The Economist, FT, and more,
with one subscription

Topics

Places

249,088 stories

The United States

Fourteen days free

Download the app

One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.

Download on the AppStore

Get it on Google Play