A potential gag order in the case involving former President Donald Trump has been proposed by the legal team of District Attorney Bragg. The order aims to restrict Trump from criticizing potential witnesses, jurors, attorneys not affiliated with Bragg, court staff, and their family members. This move comes in response to Trump's history of attacking individuals involved in legal proceedings, including jurors in cases like that of Roger Stone.
The protective order seeks to prevent Trump from disclosing juror identities or addresses to his supporters or confidants. The filing emphasizes concerns about juror harassment and intimidation, citing Trump's past behavior. The request for the gag order is seen as a measure to ensure the integrity of the proceedings, facilitate jury selection, and safeguard juror safety.
Furthermore, the need for security measures for District Attorney Bragg has been highlighted due to increased threats against his office since Trump began criticizing him and the case in March 2023. The threats included instances of letters containing death threats and suspicious substances sent to Bragg's office.
Legal experts weigh in on the proposed gag order, noting its narrow focus on protecting jurors and witnesses while balancing Trump's First Amendment rights. The order is considered appropriate given Trump's unique history of targeting individuals involved in legal matters.
Notably, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen is expected to be a witness in the case, raising questions about Trump's ability to comment on Cohen. The gag order, if approved, would likely restrict Trump from making any statements regarding Cohen or other witnesses involved in the proceedings.