In a recent development, the Colorado Republican Party has taken their election appeal all the way to the Supreme Court. The primary question on everyone's mind is what course of action can we expect to see from the highest court in the land? The timing of the case is crucial, with the state's certification date of January 5th looming. However, an intriguing option presents itself, which the state of Colorado and even the Supreme Court itself might prefer to take.
According to reports, Colorado's Secretary of State has agreed that if the Supreme Court does not provide a ruling before the certification date, former President Donald Trump will still remain on the state's ballot. This is based on the assumption that the Supreme Court is unlikely to agree with the Supreme Court of Colorado or decline any review. Consequently, with no action required, Trump will retain his spot on the ballot.
Nevertheless, the situation becomes more interesting thereafter. Colorado could argue that the issue has become moot due to the lack of an alteration on the ballot. By doing so, they could potentially avoid the Supreme Court's review altogether. However, it remains widely speculated that the Supreme Court will ultimately reverse the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court. Hence, it is possible that they may choose to let time run out and effectively moot the case. Given the short time frame available for the Supreme Court to make a decision, it is currently under scrutiny if they will decide to take up the appeal.
The Colorado case is not the only election challenge demanding the Supreme Court's attention. Similar challenges have emerged in other states, including Michigan, and there are even more challenges in the pipeline. The Supreme Court faces the dilemma of whether they should intervene and settle these disputes once and for all. Many argue that a decision must be rendered to put an end to these unfounded and potentially destabilizing theories.
While multiple cases involving former President Trump are pending, such as his immunity claim and the law pertaining to the January 6th prosecutions, the Colorado election case carries particular gravitas for the constitutional system. The issue of immunity may not favor Trump, as the D.C. Circuit is expected to rule against him. It is uncertain whether the Supreme Court would support as broad an immunity claim as Trump is making. However, the former president's primary objective may well be to run down the clock, given the looming March trial date for the special counsel.
The Supreme Court faces critical decisions in the realm of electoral challenges and presidential immunity claims. These cases have significant implications for the stability of the democratic system. The hope is that the Supreme Court will address them swiftly, decisively, and with an overwhelming consensus. However, it remains to be seen if the Supreme Court will seize this opportunity or take an exit ramp, delaying their ruling and leaving everyone eagerly awaiting their verdict.
