In a final statement at his impeachment trial, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol defended his martial law decree that led to political chaos. Yoon addressed the Constitutional Court as it concluded arguments in his trial, with a ruling expected by mid-March on whether to remove him from office or reinstate his powers.
The impeachment stemmed from Yoon's martial law decree on Dec. 3, which caused turmoil, rattled financial markets, and damaged South Korea's international reputation. Yoon, a conservative, faces rebellion charges and potential severe penalties if convicted.
Yoon attributed his martial law declaration to a perceived crisis caused by the opposition-controlled National Assembly's actions. He accused the Democratic Party of obstructing his agenda and engaging in anti-state activities, leading to his drastic measure.
Despite sending troops and police to the assembly, lawmakers managed to overturn Yoon's decree, prompting its withdrawal. Yoon maintained that his actions were aimed at maintaining order and not disrupting the assembly's work.
During the trial, Democratic Party lawmakers criticized Yoon for undermining the constitution and disturbing public order with his martial law imposition. They called for his dismissal to restore stability in the country.
The ongoing political turmoil has divided South Korean society, with massive rallies both supporting and opposing Yoon. The Constitutional Court's decision is expected to deepen the conservative-liberal divide, regardless of the outcome.
In his testimony, Yoon pledged to pursue political reforms and consider a constitutional revision if reinstated. He hinted at stepping down before the end of his term in 2027 to promote further reform.
The future of South Korea's political system remains uncertain, with calls for changes to the current presidential setup. Suggestions range from a parliamentary Cabinet system to a U.S.-style presidency with the option for re-election, reflecting the country's evolving political landscape.
