Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
ABC News
ABC News
National
James Purtill

NSW, Queensland floods on track to be among country's worst-ever natural disasters, Climate Council says

Floods account for the greatest property damage of any natural disaster in Australia. (ABC North Coast: Samantha Turnbull)

The ongoing floods in Queensland and New South Wales are on track to be one of Australia's worst-ever natural disasters.

And if this news isn't bleak enough, we can expect more extensive and more frequent flooding as climate change intensifies. 

These are the conclusions of a Climate Council report summarising the latest data on the scale of the disaster and underlining the link to global warming caused by human activity.

The Brisbane "rain bomb", for instance, dropped more water on the city than typically falls in London over an entire year, and the volume flowing through the Brisbane River far exceeded the 2010-11 floods.

Insurance claims along the eastern seaboard may be as great as the 2019-20 Black Summer bushfires.

So how bad is the property damage?

Insurance claims will exceed 2010-11 Queensland floods

The scale of the 2022 floods is emerging as reports filter out of the disaster zones, insurance claims are made, and statistics compiled.

The Climate Council report, published today, provides a snapshot of what we know so far — and it appears this natural disaster is going to rank highly.

The cost of weather-related disasters in Australia has risen since the 1970s. (Supplied: Climate Council)

The total value of the insurance claims will exceed those of previous major floods, including the last time Brisbane flooded in 2010-11, said Nicki Hutley, economics spokesperson for the Climate Council. 

"Obviously we're still counting the costs and don't know the full extent," said Ms Hutley, a former Deloitte economist.

"The Queensland floods of 2010-11 had property damage of $1.5 billion, and we're certainly probably already at that level, if not exceeding it."

Insurance claims could even exceed the 2019-20 Black Summer bushfires, which totalled about $2.5 billion.

"Certainly the property damage may be higher — the fires burnt through millions of hectares, but a lot was uninhabited," she said.

"In terms of the total number of people affected and total costs, I imagine this will be, if not the worst natural disaster, then certainly right up there."

Flood level records broken

Local records for rainfall, flood levels and flood rescues have been broken.

The "rain bomb" that broke over Brisbane on Friday, February 25, deposited 80 per cent of the region's annual rainfall within three days.

The downpour was greater than the 2010-11 floods: about 50 per cent more water poured into the Brisbane River's Wivenhoe Dam in half the time.

Brisbane's "rain bomb" dumped more than one metre of water on most of the city. (Supplied: Climate Council)

Further to the south, flood level records that had stood for decades were broken.

Wilsons River in the Northern Rivers district of NSW broke the 1954 flood level record by more than two metres.

The Richmond River at Woodburn topped 7.18 metres, nearly 50 per cent high than its previous record.

NSW SES carried out more flood rescues in 24 hours than it had ever done before.

The mass of water in this flood is "quite remarkable", says Will Steffen from Australian National University's Climate Change Institute.

"It will certainly rank up with one of the biggest natural disasters around the country," he said.

Extreme events are becoming 'ordinary'

When Brisbane flooded in 2010-11, the disaster was reported in the media as a one-in-100-year event.

The same happened when Townsville flooded in 2019, Professor Steffen said.

"And now we've heard that term applies to the latest bout of flooding," he said.

Parts of Brisbane were still recovering from the 2010-11 floods when the latest flood hit. (ABC Radio Brisbane: Antonia O'Flaherty)

Extreme rainfall can occur for a variety of reasons and directly linking a single event, like a flood, to climate change requires a formal attribution study, which can take years to produce.

However, it is possible to say whether climate change contributed to the floods.

This is a complicated question and some experts say there's a risk of overstating the effect of climate change on the multi-day heavy rainfall that has led to the 2022 floods.

But Professor Steffen says there's no doubt that a "climate system on steroids" contributed to the floods.

A warmer atmosphere is both more energetic and can hold more water, which "stacks the odds" in favour of extreme rainfall, he said.

"The intensity of rainfall will continue to increase on that ratio of 7 per cent for every degree of temperature rise."

Floods cause the greatest damage of any natural disaster in Australia. (Supplied: Climate Council)

This change is already being observed, he said.

The 2020 CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology State of the Climate report found the intensity of short-duration extreme rainfall (i.e. flash flooding) had increased by around 10 per cent in some regions.

The recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report predicted the world was on track to warm by 1.5C in the early 2030s, and by 2C this century. 

As the temperature of the atmosphere continues to rise, destructive floods are likely to happen more regularly, Professor Steffen says.

"The economics of this is going to make a lot of places unviable."

Should every house be rebuilt?

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared a national floods emergency, which gives the federal government power to deploy money and resources faster.

Communities impacted by the floods will receive public funds to rebuild.

But some areas should not be rebuilt, Professor Steffen says.

"We need to have a very good look at zoning laws and where people are allowed to build."

Insurers are already refusing to cover flood damage in some areas, because climate change has made the risk so high, Ms Hutley said.

One solution to this is for the government to step in as the insurer, but this is risky and could eat up public funds.

"It's a never-ending bottomless liability and it becomes extremely dangerous from a financial security point of view," Ms Hutley said.

Politicians will have to make difficult and unpopular decisions about where people can rebuild — and where new housing developments can be located.

And these decisions will need to be made quickly, she said.

"People who want to rebuild now need an answer sooner rather than later."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.