Former New Jersey governor, Chris Christie, is being considered for a potential bipartisan third-party ticket by the organization No Labels. Although Christie is no longer in the running for the Republican nomination for president, there is still a chance he could end up on the ballot this year. No Labels believes that Christie aligns with the kind of candidate they are looking for, as he is seen as refreshingly independent.
No Labels aims to provide a unity ticket that offers an alternative for Americans who are dissatisfied with the current choices in the presidential race. They are actively seeking ballot access across the country in order to fulfill this goal. The organization believes that the American public is signaling their unhappiness with the current options, and they want to provide an alternative should it be needed after Super Tuesday.
However, concerns have been raised about the potential impact an independent ticket could have on the presidential race. Some fear that such a ticket could split the vote and inadvertently help re-elect President Donald Trump. No Labels strongly refutes this idea, stating that it is ludicrous to think that they would engage in anything to help Trump, especially considering their past bipartisan efforts and support for initiatives such as the impeachment of the President.
The organization acknowledges that there is a possibility that an independent ticket could draw voters from both sides of the political spectrum. However, they emphasize that their intention is not to be a spoiler, but rather to launch a ticket with the aim of winning the presidency.
It is worth noting that historically, third-party candidates have not seen significant success in presidential elections. The closest example was Ross Perot in 1992, who led in the polls initially but ultimately received less than 20% of the vote in the general election. Critics argue that a similar outcome could occur, with an independent ticket potentially drawing votes away from the Democratic nominee.
Questions have also been raised about the funding of No Labels. As a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization, they are not required to disclose their donors. However, concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in this regard, particularly considering the potential impact an independent ticket could have on the race. No Labels has stated that they would adhere to Federal Election Commission rules regarding disclosure if and when they put together a ticket.
No Labels believes that their efforts to gain ballot access are essential in responding to the desires of the American people for an alternative option. They argue that democracy is under attack and that they are trying to provide another choice beyond what is currently being offered.
In conclusion, Chris Christie's potential inclusion on a no labels ticket is still being considered, as the organization aims to provide a bipartisan alternative for dissatisfied voters. The impact of such a ticket on the presidential race is uncertain, with both potential benefits and risks being debated. No Labels continues to strive for ballot access and emphasizes the importance of providing another option to the American public.
