Attorney General Merrick Garland is facing criticism from President Biden for a special counsel report that includes an assessment of Biden's mental fitness. The report, conducted by Robert Herr, concludes that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute President Biden for classified document mishandling. However, it also includes Herr's opinion on Biden's memory, which the President finds unnecessary and inappropriate.
Many legal experts argue that Herr's mention of Biden's mental fitness was out of bounds and should not have been included in the report. They believe that it is not appropriate for Herr, who is not a medical professional, to make a diagnosis of the President's memory. Additionally, they feel that the language used in the report is gratuitous and goes against the norm of the Justice Department.
Former Attorney General Eric Holder shares this perspective, stating that such language should not have been included in the report. He believes that reports should stick to the facts and avoid unnecessary personal assessments.
There is also criticism regarding the choice of Herr, a Trump appointee, to conduct the investigation into President Biden. Critics argue that appointing individuals with political agendas against their boss can lead to political damage, as seen in this case.
Furthermore, some pundits and journalists have raised concerns about the time it took for the Justice Department and the Special Counsel's Office to bring forward allegations against former President Trump. They believe that Garland's legacy as Attorney General may be shaped by the perception that he delayed action on Trump-related issues.
Despite these criticisms, Garland has succeeded in restoring normalcy and repairing the Justice Department in several areas. There has been movement in the civil rights section, and Garland has been praised for his efforts to bring back a nonpartisan approach. However, this approach has also faced criticism, as Republicans continue to label him as partisan.
In conclusion, the inclusion of a mention of President Biden's mental fitness in the special counsel report has sparked controversy. Critics argue that it was inappropriate and unnecessary. Garland's decision to appoint a Republican to investigate a Democratic President has also drawn scrutiny. The pace of Trump-related cases and the perception of delay have fueled further criticism. Garland's overall legacy as Attorney General remains a topic of debate.
