During a recent legal proceeding, Trump attorney Emil Bove questioned Keith Davidson about his previous testimony regarding Michael Cohen's demeanor. Davidson had previously stated that Cohen could be an 'aggressive guy.'
Bove then posed a question to Davidson, asking if he himself could also be aggressive. In response, Davidson stated that he did not know.
These exchanges took place as part of a larger legal context, likely related to ongoing investigations or legal disputes involving the individuals mentioned. The questioning appears to be aimed at understanding the dynamics and interactions between the parties involved.
It is common for attorneys to probe witnesses about their perceptions and experiences with other individuals involved in a case. By questioning Davidson about his assessment of Cohen's behavior and his own potential for aggression, Bove may be seeking to establish a certain narrative or line of questioning for the legal proceedings.
Overall, this exchange sheds light on the complexities and nuances of legal proceedings, where attorneys carefully navigate testimonies and statements to build their case or challenge the opposing side's arguments. The back-and-forth between Bove and Davidson underscores the strategic nature of legal questioning and the importance of understanding the perspectives of all parties involved.
