Recently, the US State Department made a notable change to its online fact sheet on US relations with Taiwan by removing the phrase 'we do not support Taiwan independence.' This move, described as a 'routine' update, has sparked a strong reaction from China, with Beijing accusing the Trump administration of a 'serious regression' in its stance on Taiwan.
China, which considers Taiwan as its own territory, has long opposed any support for Taiwan independence and views it as a red line issue. The Chinese Foreign Ministry criticized the US for the revision, warning of potential damage to China-US relations and urging Washington to correct its 'mistakes' promptly.
Analysts have pointed out that Chinese leaders are particularly concerned about the influence of Trump's new foreign policy team, which includes prominent China hawks like Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio has been a vocal supporter of Taiwan and has advocated for strengthening ties between the US and Taipei.
In response to the backlash, the State Department clarified that the wording change was part of a standard update and reiterated the US commitment to the 'one China policy.' This policy recognizes the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government and acknowledges Beijing's position on Taiwan while opposing any unilateral changes to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan's Foreign Minister welcomed the website change, emphasizing the positive stance on US-Taiwan relations reflected in the updated fact sheet. The document also highlighted US support for Taiwan's participation in international organizations, potentially including membership where applicable.
Amidst escalating tensions, two US Navy ships recently sailed through the Taiwan Strait, prompting a strong reaction from China's military. Beijing accused the US of 'sending the wrong signals' and increasing security risks with such actions.
As the US-China relationship continues to be tested, the issue of Taiwan remains a sensitive and contentious topic that could have significant implications for regional stability and global diplomacy.
