Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
iMore
iMore
Technology
Becca Caddy

Would you like a mechanical Apple Watch? This guy just built one from gadget junk

An Apple Watch besides an Apple Watch that's been fitted with a mechanical clock mechanism.

If you've ever stared longingly at an analogue watch despite wearing a super advanced smartwatch on your wrist, you're not alone. As advanced as the latest Apple Watch may be, there's something incredibly satisfying about watching real mechanical hands tick, tick, tick around a dial.

That's why we were fascinated by this ambitious DIY mechanical Apple Watch project from YouTuber Jack Spiggle, who goes by NanoRobotGeek. He took an old, first-generation 42mm Apple Watch, stripped out the innards and carefully placed a Seiko NH38 mechanical watch movement inside.

Why? Because he wanted to. He explains that he was shocked to learn how quickly earlier generations of Apple Watches became obsolete, stopped working and were no longer supported by updates. Why not make the most of some old gadget junk?

Meet the Apple Franken-Watch

At the beginning of the video, Spiggle explains that this is a project he's been considering for a while. "I just think it'll be so hilarious to have an Apple Watch with a mechanical watch movement," he says.

What follows is 25 minutes of Spiggle's sped-up digital to analogue process. We see him remove all of the parts of the first-gen Apple Watch without damaging any of the exterior, before meticulously placing the Seiko mechanical movement inside. 

He even tinkers with the crown so it actually works to wind the hands. "Trying to get the original button and crown to work really pushed my skills as a maker," Spiggle admitted.

We can guarantee that even if you started the video thinking this was a dumb idea, you'll be completely captivated by the end. It's also fascinating to hear Spiggle talk about the process and how even though this started out as a project to make use of tech waste, it ended up taking up much more time and money than he expected.

"There was a point where I thought I could do this project for under $100 and in a weekend. Oh boy was I wrong," he says. In the end, it took him three months and cost three to four times what he'd planned due to the fact there were lots of tools and parts he didn't think he'd need. "Not quite the miracle e-waste saving project I thought it was going to be," he admitted.

Spiggle says he's happy with the result and there's been such a huge amount of interest in the project since it went viral that he may even make more in the future.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.