Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
William Keegan

Why the ‘Barber boom’ that Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget recalls was destined for disaster

Anthony Barber leaves 11 Downing Street in London to present his budget to the Commons in March 1971.
Anthony Barber leaves 11 Downing Street in London to present his budget to the Commons in March 1971. Photograph: William Lovelace/Getty Images

The recklessness of chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s “budget for growth” evokes memories of the disastrous outcome of the last great Conservative “dash for growth”: the so-called “Barber boom” of 1971-73.

I say so-called because the wildly expansionist policy of those years was essentially the work of PM Edward Heath. His preferred chancellor, Iain Macleod, had died within a month of taking office in 1970, and Heath was thenceforth the driving force in economic policy.

It was Heath who was responsible for the famous U-turn in the winter of 1971-72. The previous policy was one of “setting the people free” by reining in public expenditure, cutting taxation and not “propping up lame ducks” when companies fell into trouble. (Any resemblance to Liz Truss’s leadership campaign pledges is coincidental.)

All of this changed that winter, when unemployment reached what was then regarded as the politically and socially intolerable level of 1 million; a major employer, Upper Clyde Shipbuilders, was threatened with closure; and the chief constable of Glasgow telephoned the PM to say he could no longer be responsible for public order unless it was rescued.

There was panic in the ranks, and the policy became one of corporate rescue and expansion at almost any cost. There is nothing new about Kwarteng’s emphasis on growth. Heath and Barber introduced an official growth target of 5% between 1971 and 1973, public expenditure controls were lifted, and in his budget chancellor Anthony Barber spoke of his object: “To achieve a rate of growth twice as fast as in the past decade.”

There were obvious concerns about inflation during boom times. Heath introduced a well-intentioned but unfortunately timed incomes policy under which wage increases would be geared to the cost of living.

Alas: in Harold Macmillan’s famous phrase, the government was hit by “events, dear boy, events” – namely the oil crisis of the autumn and winter of 1973-74, provoked by the Yom Kippur war. The oil price quadrupled, then rose again. This had a dramatic impact on wage settlements and inflation, which accelerated to 25% by mid 1975. By this time Labour was in power, the Heath government having been brought down by the pay dispute with the miners in 1974.

There are many differences between then and now, but as Kwarteng frightens the markets with previously unimaginable tax cuts, we have an independent Bank of England that is set on making counter-inflationary rises in interest rates: thus we have fiscal expansion, but monetary contraction. During the Barber boom monetary policy was also, in the words of one official, “inherently inflationary”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.