China's leaders always knew that they would have to abandon their zero-Covid policy eventually and that the longer they waited, the more painful the transition would be.
Yet they seemed mired in the policy, unable to leave it behind and move on. Then an apartment-building blaze in locked-down Xinjiang killed 10 people whose escape was thwarted by locked doors and blocked entrances. This sparked China's largest anti-government protests since the Tiananmen movement of 1989 and became the catalyst for the authorities' decision finally to begin easing restrictions.
The protests were an expression of the frustration and anger accumulated over nearly three years of aggressive lockdowns. Compared to 1989, the government's response was notably moderate: police dispersed demonstrations with relatively little violence.
China's government has also apparently listened to the protesters. It has now scrapped some of its harsher Covid policies, such as the requirement to quarantine in state facilities. But the path out of zero-Covid will be long and difficult -- and not only from a health perspective. The recent upheaval points to broader political challenges that China will face in the years to come.
The action plan for exiting zero-Covid has been known to Chinese leaders for some time. They must boost the population's immunity -- especially that of the elderly -- through some combination of higher vaccination rates and more effective foreign vaccines. Otherwise, epidemiologists estimate that opening up could cause 1–2 million Covid deaths in China.
To be sure, for a population of 1.4 billion, even 2 million deaths would amount to a much lower mortality rate than in the United States, where more than 1 million have died in a population of 330 million. But after years spent suffering under strict lockdowns as the government touted its zero-Covid credentials, the Chinese people are unlikely to find this distinction comforting.
China has attempted to ease its pandemic restrictions before only to tighten them when cases surged. This pattern is likely to continue until enough of the elderly are vaccinated and both the government and public accept the increased risk of infection and death.
What sets China apart are the political stakes. Zero-Covid was the subject of a power struggle which played out largely behind closed doors between President Xi Jinping, who was committed to the hardline approach, and moderates such as Prime Minister Li Keqiang, who advocated less stringent rules for the sake of economic growth.
Mr Xi won hands down. China maintained zero-Covid, he was appointed to an unprecedented third term as the Communist Party of China's General Secretary and the leadership of the Standing Committee, including Mr Li, was replaced by his loyalists.
Notably in his moment of political victory -- at the CPC's 20th National Congress in October -- Mr Xi re-emphasised the importance of zero-Covid. Abandoning the policy less than two months later is a blow to Mr Xi's credibility.
But this is not about one man. The zero-Covid drama could threaten the legitimacy of the entire Chinese government -- and nearly 75 years of one-party rule. This is because Chinese autocracy masks systemic instability. When citizens of democracies are dissatisfied with their politicians' performance, they vote them out of office. But China lacks a formal mechanism for citizens meaningfully to affect policy, so unhappy citizens must resort to "illegal" forms of expression, like protests.
Since these activities are outside the rules, they erode the country's institutional structure. Moreover, in a one-party system, a protest against government policy amounts to a protest against the Party, and thus, the entire regime. In today's China disagreeing with any government policy is tantamount to disagreeing with Mr Xi -- and, thus, the CPC.
As for the protests, the government will undoubtedly adopt measures to prevent them from recurring. Before the pandemic protests in Chinese cities were often followed by increased investment in police surveillance and a decline in popular resistance. This time is unlikely to be different. Even as the government eases pandemic restrictions it will tighten further control over the public sphere.
Recent developments thus bring mixed tidings for the Chinese people. Optimists can say that the end of zero-Covid is finally in sight, the government responded to the demands of the people and the protests were dispersed with little bloodshed. Pessimists, meanwhile, will point to the public's rejection of the government's Covid rules, note how it raises the political stakes of the next controversial policy and predict that the coming years are likely to bring ever tighter government control amid rising instability. ©2022 Project Syndicate
Nancy Qian is a co-director of Northwestern University's Global Poverty Research Lab and the Founding Director of China Econ Lab.
