Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The National (Scotland)
The National (Scotland)
National
Xander Elliards

Westminster bid to give Scotland power to hold new indyref every seven years

SCOTLAND would have the power to hold a fresh independence referendum every seven years – if the people vote for one, under a bill proposed at Westminster by an Alba MP.

Neale Hanvey put forward his Scotland (Self-Determination) Bill with the backing of five other MPs – Alba colleague Kenny MacAskill, SNP parliamentarians Joanna Cherry, Angus MacNeil, and Douglas Chapman, and independent Margaret Ferrier.

The bill would amend the Scotland Act 1998 to transfer the Section 30 power from Westminster to Holyrood, which can enable an independence referendum to be held.

It says the power to legislate for such a vote may only be exercised where the Scottish public has demonstrated its support for it, and that a repeat vote cannot be held sooner than seven years after the previous one.

Hanvey said: “Scotland will only become independent as and when the majority of people of Scotland choose that path.

“Yet this requires a democratic mechanism that is constitutional and satisfies international legal precedent.

“This bill seeks to standardise and codify such a requirement in line with the motion passed by this House, which endorsed the principles of the 1989 Claim of Right, which acknowledged the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of government best suited to their needs.”

The motion for leave to bring in the proposed legislation was unopposed, but ten-minute rule bills almost never become law without Government support.

Making the case for his proposals and drawing parallels with Brexit, the Alba MP suggested Conservatives would have been furious had the European Union moved to block the 2016 referendum.

He went on: “The notion is of course ludicrous because democracy is not a single event but an evolving and continuous process.

“That is how civilised people and fundamental rights of freedom of thought and expression are peacefully demonstrated.

“As a member of the EU, the UK Government possessed and exercised the veto, yet claimed its sovereignty was impeded by membership. Scotland has no such equivalent mechanism available to our people and remains subject to the wiles of our larger neighbour exemplified by Brexit.”

Hanvey also argued that the UK Government denies democracy to Scotland and not to Northern Ireland because “in the words of former prime minister John Major … the UK has no selfish strategic or economic interest in Northern Ireland, whereas in the case of Scotland, the opposite is true”.

He concluded his speech, saying: “The decision on Scotland’s future ultimately and rightly must rest in the hands of the people of Scotland and in the constitutional tradition of popular sovereignty in our great country.

“This bill is neutral in its effect. It favours neither one side nor the other, but it seeks to codify the Scottish people’s right to choose their own constitutional future.”

The bill was listed for a second reading on March 24.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.