Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
Business
Henry Saker-Clark

Water firms appeal to watchdog for higher customer bill increases

Water companies have asked the competition watchdog to allow it to raise prices by more than allowed by Ofwat (Rui Vieira/PA) - (PA Archive)

Three of the UK’s largest water firms have urged regulators to allow them to charge customers even more than previously granted.

In December, sector regulator Ofwat said it would allow water firms to raise bills by an average of £157, or 36%, over the next five years to help finance investment into crumbling infrastructure.

On Tuesday, Southern Water, Anglian Water and South East Water asked the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to reconsider bill increase plans.

Southern Water wants to increase bills by more than an agreed rise of 53% over the next five years (Chris Ison/PA) (PA Wire)

Southern Water had already been allowed a 53% increase to average bills over the next five years through the December ruling.

Anglian Water had been allowed 29% and South East Water had been granted 24%.

But the firms have all argued that they need to lift bills by more than this in order to fund improvements and to meet environmental commitments.

It comes after troubled rival Thames Water, the UK’s largest water supplier, last week called on regulators to allow it to push bills higher than the 35% rise it was allowed.

On Tuesday, Southern Water chief executive Lawrence Gosden said the settlement “would not enable us to deliver the environmental and performance improvements and new infrastructure that our customers and communities rightly expect”.

Mark Thurston, chief executive of Anglian, said: “Ofwat’s stated aims for this settlement were to align the interests of companies and investors to those of customers, by setting the appropriate balance of risk and return.

“Unfortunately, after extremely careful consideration, the Anglian Water board has concluded that Ofwat’s final determination falls short of its own stated aims, and having already factored in nearly £1 billion of efficiency savings, it means that additional pressures in the regulatory settlement are unacceptable.”

Chris Train, chairman of South East Water, added: “We have scrutinised the final determination and agree unanimously that in its current format, it presents a risk to water security for our customers in the region.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.