data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fb31/2fb311d2cfbc59a641803d8731b6fef3897523be" alt=""
Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly set to propose deploying British troops to Ukraine as part of a 30,000-strong European “reassurance force” during his meeting with Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., next week.
The plan, developed with France, would station troops in key locations such as cities, ports, and nuclear sites – but not near the frontlines.
It would focus on intelligence gathering, airspace monitoring, and securing critical infrastructure.
Sir Keir will present the plan to President Trump during his first official White House visit since the election. He is expected to urge the US to keep fighter jets and missiles on standby in Eastern Europe to deter any Russian violations of a potential agreement.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the plan “unacceptable” for Moscow, while Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that any Nato troops in Ukraine would be a “direct threat,” regardless of their banner.
News of Sir Keir Starmer’s plans comes amid rising concerns about Britain’s military readiness, with some suggesting the reintroduction of conscription.
Now we want to know what you think: Should British troops be deployed in Ukraine? Do you think Starmer’s proposals go far enough?
Are you worried about the state of Britain’s armed forces? Is there a better way to back Ukraine without direct military involvement?
Share your thoughts in the comments – we’ll feature the most compelling responses.
All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.