During the recent vice presidential debate, political commentator Van Jones made some noteworthy observations about the performances of the candidates. Jones likened the debate to a clash between 'the kitchen table vs. the Ivy League,' highlighting the contrast in styles between the two contenders.
Both candidates, Jones pointed out, are graduates of Yale Law School, a fact he emphasized by stating, 'that’s how they teach us to do it, slick, slick, slick.' This remark underscored the polished and strategic approach expected from individuals with such prestigious legal backgrounds.
Jones went on to critique one of the candidates, accusing him of attempting to 'sane-wash the crazy.' According to Jones, the candidate's objective was to downplay controversial statements made in the past and present a more composed and rational image to the public. Jones suggested that this tactic was an effort to deflect attention from previous inflammatory remarks about various groups, including women and Haitians.
Describing the current president as the 'gaslighter-in-chief,' Jones implied that the candidate was acting as a loyal supporter seeking to 'polish up the crazy.' In Jones' view, the candidate's role was to mitigate the impact of the president's divisive rhetoric and present a more palatable version of the administration's policies.
Overall, Jones' analysis of the vice presidential debate shed light on the strategies employed by the candidates to shape public perception and navigate contentious issues. His commentary provided a critical perspective on the dynamics at play during the debate and the broader political landscape.
