Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Wales Online
Wales Online
National
Anthony Lewis

Valleys warehouse to be demolished and turned into block of affordable flats despite huge opposition

Plans to demolish a warehouse and build flats in its place in Tonyrefail have been given the green light despite significant public opposition. An application to knock down the WR Bishop and Co Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale warehouse in Penrhiwfer Road and build a block of 14 flats was approved by Rhondda Cynon Taf Council’s planning committee on Thursday, June 22.

It’s a revision and resubmission of a previous application which was refused and the plan is for a two-storey residential scheme of 14 apartments which will provide 100% affordable housing on behalf of the registered social landlord, Newydd Housing Association. The key changes from the previous scheme include a reduction in the size of the new building and a reduction of two units, both of which have enabled it to be sited further away from the closest neighbouring house to the north-west.

The overall design of the elevations had also been “tidied-up”, the report said. They will be one and two-bed flats and the existing access from Penrhiwfer Road will be closed and fenced across, with a new access formed from Bryn Rhedyn, leading to a car park area containing 15 spaces, a bike and bin store and a sitting out area.

Read more: ' I was taken to court for not recycling because of Fruit Shoots in my wheelie bin - and they weren't even mine'

A soft landscaping plan has been provided which indicates that the land to the north-east and north-west of the site would be grassed and enclosed by a hedge. The plan also includes four sections of rain garden, as well as other planting to the front boundary.

There were 27 letters of objection received by the council as well as a previously submitted petition relating to the earlier refused scheme, which contained 936 signatures. The concerns raised covered planning policy, land use, infrastructure, highways, design and appearance, residential amenity, community safety and procedural issues among other matters.

The objectors raised concerns that local healthcare and school facilities were oversubscribed, an improvement in infrastructure was needed before the council gave permission to future developments, the sewerage system was insufficient and that there was a lack of need for the development.

They also claimed the minor changes were not sufficient to address previous objections on access and safety grounds, there was insufficient parking space and that it was wrong to assume that there would be only one car per flat, the proposed entrance from Bryn Rhedyn was not safe, the entrance to the Co-op was very dangerous for pedestrians and vehicles and more cars would increase the chances of collisions, the danger to children playing in the street and that the traffic surveys were undertaken when Wales was under Covid restrictions and people were told to work from home and travel only when necessary.

They said the block of flats would be “unsightly” and not fit in, that it was too big, a mixture of dwellings would be more appropriate, the density was inappropriate and it would not assimilate with existing housing. They also raised concerns about overlooking and overshadowing of neighbouring properties as well as noise and disturbance, potential behavioural problems coming to the area, that not all home owners in close proximity to the site got the consultation letter and that existing poor water pressure would suffer further.

In recommending approval, planning officers said: “The proposed development would enable the re-use of a previously developed site, providing much-needed affordable housing in a sustainable location within the settlement boundary, close to shops and services. The design, massing and scale of the new building would be acceptable in the context of the surrounding development and compared with the existing appearance of the site, would have a beneficial impact on the immediate street scene.

They added that “it is considered that the development would not be detrimental to neighbour amenity and no other concerns have been raised by statutory consultees, particularly with regard to access and highway safety. Consequently, the proposed development is considered to be acceptable in respect of the LDP and national planning policy framework.”

Councillor Danny Grehan said he thought the development was too much of the same thing in one place and that it had just been tweaked a little bit. He said: “I’m still not happy that there are so many flats in one place.” He asked what happened if there was a fire and there wasn’t an exit for the residents, and raised concerns about the entrance to the flats in relation to safety. He also raised the issue around the doctor’s surgery being swamped by the number of houses coming to Tonyrefail and mentioned highways safety concerns and the location of the bin storage area.

Cllr Grehan called for a sensible letting policy on the development for at least the first year, while Councillor Mike Powell suggested a site visit to consider the access to the site.

Councillor Gareth Hughes talked about the housing need that was there and said: “It is difficult to deliver developments to meet these needs of one bedroom flats without developing some developments such as the one proposed today.” He said the development was a betterment in terms of what was currently there and that a residential use was a far better one in this location than the current warehouse use.

On parking, he said the data told them that social housing had lower car ownership and said it was in a sustainable location near shops and bus stops. He agreed with the idea of considering a local letting policy but said he didn’t believe it would have a detrimental impact on services, adding that he thought the developer had tried its best to amend the plans to minimise disruption.

He said: “I’d also like to assure residents that I’ve certainly listened to their concerns. I’ve listened to the concerns of the local MP, the local MS and the local councillor. The easiest thing in the world for me to do would be to sit here and agree with them all. That would be really very easy for me. However, I can’t do that because I respectfully disagree with them.

“I think people need housing. I think this is an acceptable development.” Councillor Ross Williams said he understood how emotive it was but added that they desperately needed housing and they were facing this issue daily as local members.

A motion to refuse the application failed and the application was approved.

To get the latest email updates from WalesOnline click here https://www.walesonline.co.uk/newsletter-preference-centre/

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.