The US Supreme Court has decided not to hear the appeal of a New Mexico official who was removed from office due to their involvement in the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.
The official had sought to challenge their removal from office, arguing that it violated their constitutional rights. However, the Supreme Court's decision not to take up the case means that the lower court's ruling stands.
The New Mexico official was ousted from their position following their participation in the violent events that unfolded at the Capitol on January 6. The insurrection, which was incited by former President Donald Trump, resulted in multiple deaths and widespread damage to the Capitol building.
Despite the official's attempts to appeal their removal, the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case signals that the lower court's decision was upheld. This serves as a reminder of the consequences that individuals may face for their involvement in acts of insurrection and violence against the government.
The decision by the US Supreme Court not to hear the appeal underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly when those actions threaten the foundations of democracy.
