THE UN Security Council has adopted a watered-down resolution calling for the immediate acceleration of aid deliveries to civilians in Gaza but without the original call for an “urgent suspension of hostilities” between Israel and Hamas.
The vote in the 15-member council was 13-0 with the United States and Russia abstaining. The UK voted for the resolution.
The vote followed a US veto of a Russian amendment that would have restored the call for a suspension of hostilities. That vote was 10 members in favour, the US against and four abstentions. It is unclear if the UK voted for the amendment or abstained.
The revised text was negotiated during a week-and-a-half of high-level diplomacy by the United States, the United Arab Emirates and others.
US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said the United States, Israel’s closest ally, backed it. The US abstention avoided a second US veto of a Gaza resolution following Hamas’s October 7 attacks inside Israel.
Council members met behind closed doors on Thursday to discuss a revised draft resolution, then delayed the vote so they could consult their capitals on the significant changes, aimed at avoiding a US veto. A new text with a few minor revisions was circulated on Friday morning.
Between Tuesday and Thursday, US secretary of state Antony Blinken spoke to the foreign ministers of Egypt and the United Arab Emirates three times each as well as to the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the UK, France and Germany.
The vote, initially scheduled for Monday, has been delayed every day since then.
UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron welcomed the vote as “good news” in a statement, saying: “Crucially, the resolution also calls for steps towards a sustainable ceasefire.
“This is an outcome that I advocated for last week along with the German foreign minister and strongly think is the right approach.
“A sustainable ceasefire must mean that Hamas is no longer there, able to threaten Israel with rocket attacks and other forms of terrorism.”
He added: “It has been a difficult process to reach agreement within the UN but there is now greater unity and purpose about what needs to happen to relieve the humanitarian crisis, and to start working towards the sustainable ceasefire that the British government has argued for.”
Labour leader Keir Starmer, who has also called for work towards a “sustained” ceasefire, said: “I welcome today’s vote at the United Nations Security Council.
“The horrors of recent months have been intolerable. This resolution describes how we must work for a sustained ceasefire.
“The next humanitarian truce is urgent, and in the space it brings, intense diplomacy should begin to set new terms under which fighting does not restart and the risk of escalation is reduced.
“Hamas must release all the remaining hostages, end all attacks on Israel and have no role in the future governance of Gaza.
“Israel must agree to end its bombing campaign, allow a humanitarian surge into Gaza, and end settler violence and displacement in the West Bank.”
He said a sustained ceasefire was “necessary, but not sufficient” to ensuring long-term peace in the region, insisting there must be “a new political process that has the capacity, conviction and commitment to turn a rhetoric around two states living side by side in peace into reality”.
Rather than watered down, Thomas-Greenfield described the resolution as “strong” and said it “is fully supported by the Arab group that provides them what they feel is needed to get humanitarian assistance on the ground”.
But it was stripped of its key provision – a call for “the urgent suspension of hostilities to allow safe and unhindered humanitarian access, and for urgent steps towards a sustainable cessation of hostilities”.
Instead, it calls “for urgent steps to immediately allow safe and unhindered humanitarian access, and also for creating the conditions for a sustainable cessation of hostilities”. The steps are not defined, but diplomats said if adopted this would mark the council’s first reference to stopping fighting.
On a key sticking point concerning aid deliveries, the new draft eliminates a previous request for the UN “to exclusively monitor all humanitarian relief consignments to Gaza provided through land, sea and air routes” by outside parties to confirm their humanitarian nature.
It substitutes a request to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres (below) to expeditiously appoint “a senior humanitarian and reconstruction co-ordinator with responsibility for facilitating, co-ordinating, monitoring and verifying” whether relief deliveries to Gaza that are not from the parties to the conflict are humanitarian goods.
It asks the co-ordinator to expeditiously establish a “mechanism” to accelerate aid deliveries and demands that the parties to the conflict — Israel and Hamas — co-operate with the co-ordinator.
Thomas-Greenfield said the US negotiated the new draft with the United Arab Emirates, the Arab representative on the council which sponsored the resolution, and with Egypt, which borders Gaza, and others. This mainly bypassed the 13 other council members, several of whom objected to being left out, according to some anonymous diplomats.
Guterres has said Gaza faces “a humanitarian catastrophe” and warned that a total collapse of the humanitarian support system would lead to “a complete breakdown of public order and increased pressure for mass displacement into Egypt”.
According to a report released on Thursday by 23 UN and humanitarian agencies, Gaza’s entire 2.2 million population is in a food crisis or worse and 576,600 are at the “catastrophic” starvation level. With supplies to Gaza cut off except for a small trickle, the UN World Food Programme has said 90% of the population is regularly going without food for a full day.
Nearly 20,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, since the war started. During the October 7 attack, Hamas militants killed around 1200 people in Israel and took around 240 hostages back to Gaza.
Hamas controls the Gaza Strip, and its Health Ministry does not differentiate between civilian and combatant deaths. Thousands more Palestinians are buried under the rubble of Gaza, the UN estimates.
Security Council resolutions are legally binding, but in practice many parties choose to ignore the council’s requests for action. General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are a significant barometer of world opinion.
