Former President Trump's attorney, Will Sharf, expressed strong sentiments regarding the ongoing trial in New York, alleging bias and unfair treatment by Judge Marchand. Trump himself labeled the proceedings as rigged, echoing past experiences with what he perceives as unjust legal battles.
Andrew Weissman, a key figure in the Mueller-Russia investigation, praised Judge Marchand's judicial temperament, contrasting sharply with Sharf's accusations of bias. Sharf argued for the judge's recusal, citing irretrievable bias under New York law.
Sharf emphasized the defense's confidence in Trump's innocence, urging the jury to consider the evidence impartially. He highlighted instances of what he deemed as false testimony by witnesses, particularly focusing on Michael Cohen's credibility issues.
Sharf commended the defense's cross-examination of Cohen, alleging inconsistencies and lies in his testimony. He portrayed Cohen as lacking credibility, pointing to admissions of grand larceny and potential bank fraud.
In the event of an acquittal, Sharf hinted at potential legal action against Judge Marchand, suggesting a case for malicious prosecution. Conversely, if a conviction occurs, the defense plans to swiftly appeal, aiming to overturn any unfavorable verdict.
Sharf outlined the appellate process, indicating a speedy pursuit of justice through the New York appellate division and the Court of Appeals in Albany. He assured a prompt response to any adverse rulings, emphasizing the team's commitment to challenging what they perceive as an unjust outcome.
