Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

Trial Of New Jersey Man In Rushdie Stabbing

Hadi Matar, charged with severely injuring author Salman Rushdie in a 2022 knife attack, walks in to Chautauqua County court in Mayville, N.Y., Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Adrian Kraus)

A New Jersey man accused of stabbing author Salman Rushdie in 2022 has chosen not to testify in his defense as his trial nears its conclusion. The defendant, Hadi Matar, 27, made this decision as his lawyers rested their case without calling any witnesses.

Prosecutors in Chautauqua County Court, New York, called a forensics expert as their final witness after seven days of testimony, including a significant account from Rushdie himself. The incident, which occurred at the Chautauqua Institution, resulted in Rushdie sustaining serious injuries, including blindness in one eye, and another individual, Henry Reese, suffering a gash above his eye.

Matar, a resident of Fairview, New Jersey, has been charged with attempted murder and assault in connection with the attack. Despite his vocal statements outside the courtroom, his defense team had not confirmed whether he would testify during the trial.

Prosecutors call forensics expert as final witness in Chautauqua County Court.
Matar chooses not to testify in his defense as trial nears end.
Matar charged with attempted murder and assault for the attack on Rushdie.
Matar's defense team questions intent to kill, highlighting use of knife.
Rushdie suffered multiple stab and slash wounds during the assault.
Matar faces federal charges for attempting to support Hezbollah.
Rushdie left blind in one eye after the incident at Chautauqua Institution.
Matar's lawyers rest their case without calling any witnesses.
Defense aims to raise doubts about Matar's alleged intent to murder Rushdie.
Separate federal indictment against Matar in U.S. District Court in Buffalo.

While Matar's lawyers opted not to present any witnesses, they aimed to challenge the prosecution's case by raising doubts about Matar's alleged intent to kill Rushdie. They highlighted the fact that Matar used a knife, not a gun, and emphasized that Rushdie survived the attack, which witnesses described as a 'skirmish' or 'scuffle.'

Public Defender Nathaniel Barone expressed skepticism about the prosecution's ability to prove intent to murder, citing the nature of the altercation and the weapon used. Rushdie endured multiple stab and slash wounds to various parts of his body during the unprovoked assault, which occurred as he was preparing to participate in a discussion on writer safety.

In addition to the ongoing trial in Chautauqua County Court, Matar also faces a separate federal indictment in U.S. District Court in Buffalo. The federal charges against him include attempting to provide material support to the militant group Hezbollah.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.