![](https://img.topnews.live/resize-4/photos/638730194461700053.jpg)
A third federal judge has recently issued a temporary block on President Donald Trump's executive order that aimed to end birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants in the United States.
This latest ruling comes from a judge in New Hampshire and adds to the previous decisions made by judges in Washington state and Maryland.
The executive order, which was signed by President Trump, sought to challenge the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all individuals born in the country, regardless of their parents' immigration status.
![](https://img.topnews.live/resize-4/photos/638730938317227487.jpg)
![](https://img.topnews.live/resize-4/photos/638730194461700053.jpg)
![](https://img.topnews.live/resize-4/photos/638736631999659738.jpg)
Legal challenges against the order have been mounting since its announcement, with critics arguing that it goes against the fundamental principles of the Constitution and would have far-reaching implications for immigrant families in the country.
The New Hampshire judge's decision to block the executive order temporarily means that the status quo regarding birthright citizenship remains in place for now, pending further legal proceedings and potential appeals.
President Trump's administration has been vocal in its efforts to crack down on illegal immigration and has made several policy changes in that regard since taking office. The issue of birthright citizenship has been a contentious one, with supporters of the President's order arguing that it is necessary to address what they see as a loophole in the immigration system.
However, opponents of the order view it as an attack on the rights of immigrant communities and a departure from the country's historical commitment to welcoming immigrants.
As the legal battle over the executive order continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the courts will ultimately rule on the matter and what implications it may have for the future of birthright citizenship in the United States.