Elaine Herzberg was the first pedestrian to be killed by a self-driving car but she likely won't be the last. Just two weeks after she was hit by a self-driving Uber Volvo SUV
the tech giant has settled with the Herzberg family out of court. A lawyer representing the family issued a short statement that there would be no further comment. It was clear from the outset that the trial lawyers were preparing to attack Uber's eagerness to test possibly-incomplete technologies. So regardless of the amount paid, Uber has likely avoided enormous potential damage from having the case heard in open court. But in protecting itself Uber might also just have kicked the can down the road.
The case has revealed a knotty legal argument concerning self-driving cars and liability. If, as has been argued, an attentive human driver
could have avoided the question, who is at fault? The car manufacturer? The company that owns it? The computer engineers who calibrated the sensors? Or the inattentive test driver who was revealed to have been looking away from the road in the moments before the crash? The death has shaken the industry, with local politicians, carmakers and tech companies alike calling for
a slow-down in testing unproven technology.
That slow-down is being heeded by Nvidia Corp, a tech company that has developed a suite of processors to be used in driverless vehicles. Although early speculation
about faulty sensors was pointed at Nvidia, the company quickly fired back saying that only its Graphics Processing Units were used in Uber's self-driving cars, not it sensors. Regardless, Nvidia's chairman announced that it would suspend all self-driving tests immediately.
Arizona Governor Doug Ducey also moved promptly to strip Uber of the right to test self-driving cars on public roads. But behind this swift and sensible decision is an uncomfortable truth. Leaked emails
reveal a long courtship between Ducey and Uber. It's clear that Ducey was keen to expedite Uber's testing process in Arizona; questions are now being asked whether his haste allowed for incomplete regulatory oversight of the tests. While this could lead to embarrassing findings, Ducey is by no means the only lawmaker in America or elsewhere doing favours for tech giants.
But lest you think that our self-driving future is now reversing at speed, elsewhere in the industry good news has been easy to find. This week Alphabet's self-driving offshoot Waymo inked a
ground-breaking deal with Jaguar. The deal will see Waymo integrate its technology into 20,000 I-Pace electric SUVs built by Jaguar. Testing will begin this year and Waymo is expecting to see all the vehicles become part of its self-driving ride-hailing company set to launch in 2020. Needless to say this is yet another blow to Uber.
An interesting statistic (and one we'll be keeping a close eye one) surfaced this week: in America 1.18 people die per 100 million miles driven. Uber's self-driving vehicles have claimed the life of a pedestrian after just 3 million miles tested. While this certainly isn't an accurate predictor of self-driving cars' potential to be a life-saving force in the future, it seems we're not there yet. So what's concerning is the headlong rush into lucrative new technologies that often sees companies cutting corners to attain a competitive edge.