Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Amelia Gentleman

The racist legislation that led to Windrush

West Indian immigrants arriving at Waterloo in 1961
Immigrants arriving at Waterloo in 1961. The Home Office has repeatedly refused to make its Windrush report public. Photograph: Norman Potter/Getty Images

A suppressed report on the Windrush scandal has concluded that its origins lie in three decades of racist immigration legislation designed to reduce the UK’s non-white population.

It found that the “deep-rooted racism of the Windrush scandal” had roots in the fact that “during the period 1950-1981, every single piece of immigration or citizenship legislation was designed at least in part to reduce the number of people with black or brown skin who were permitted to live and work in the UK”.

The leaked copy of the government-commissioned paper, which the Home Office has repeatedly refused to make public, lists a few specific examples. Here are some of those considered among the most damaging:

  • The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act introduced a voucher system, under which only a limited number of migrants from the Commonwealth were permitted to enter the UK, curtailing free movement within the British empire and restricting an open-door policy that had been enshrined in law in 1948

  • The 1968 Commonwealth Immigrants Act altered the rules on who could apply for employment vouchers, dividing applicants into “belonging” and “non-belonging” citizens. To qualify as belonging, an individual had to prove a connection to the UK through a parent or grandparent – in other words, “belonging” was a euphemism for “white”. The legislation also deprived more than a million individuals worldwide of their right to enter Britain, including those from the Caribbean, Malaysia and Singapore, many of whom held only British passports and so were effectively rendered stateless.

  • The 1971 Immigration Act further constrained Commonwealth citizens’ right to enter the UK, ending large-scale immigration from the Commonwealth. It introduced a new term, “patrial”, to describe those to whom immigration controls would not apply. A “patrial” was defined as an individual who had a grandparent born in the UK, or a parent born or naturalised in the UK. This meant that white citizens of former colonies, such as those from Canada, Australia and other “settler colonies”, were the beneficiaries of positive discrimination in that they were far more likely than their counterparts from places like Jamaica to have UK-born ancestors.

  • The 1981 British Nationality Act followed concerns expressed by Margaret Thatcher that “people are really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by people with a different culture”. The act required Commonwealth citizens who had settled in the UK to register to become British citizens.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.