This article is part of a series about a legal threat sent to Crikey by Lachlan Murdoch, over an article Crikey published about the January 6 riots in the US. For the series introduction go here, and for the full series go here.
This is the first letter exchange. To read all the letters, click here.
From Murdoch
With matters becoming a little tense though still polite, Churchill states he disagrees with “each of the contentions” of our previous letter. He also claims that Lachlan Murdoch “is not seeking to dictate stories” and that he has not been “unreasonable or ‘intimidatory'”.
From Crikey
Our lawyer Michael Bradley replies, saying that Crikey “stands by its reporting”.
This is the final letter exchange. Click here for the full series.
