Appeals against the approval of a plan to restructure Thames Water through a loan of up to £3 billion has been dismissed, Court of Appeal judges have said.
In February, a High Court judge sanctioned a plan proposed by Thames Water Utilities Holdings Limited (TWUH), the parent company of Thames Water Group, allowing the utility to stay afloat just weeks before it was due to run out of money.
A group of the utility's secondary creditors, as well as TWUH's parent company, Thames Water Limited (TWL), appealed against the decision at a hearing last week.
Liberal Democrat MP Charlie Maynard also appealed against the ruling, claiming that the company should instead be placed into special administration (SAR) to better serve customer interests.
In an order on Monday, Sir Julian Flaux, sitting with Sir Nicholas Patten and Lord Justice Zacaroli, said the appeals were dismissed with reasons to follow in writing "in due course".
Thames Water's chief executive Chris Weston said the firm was "pleased" that the Court of Appeal had upheld a "strong High Court decision".
He continued: "We remain focused on putting Thames Water onto a more stable financial foundation as we seek a long-term solution to our financial resilience. Today's news demonstrates further progress.
"We continue to work closely with our creditors, enabling us to access liquidity to continue to implement our turnaround plan so we can deliver better results for our customers and the environment while seeking to attract new capital into the business.
"As we have previously stated, the Company Plan will not affect customer bills but will provide continued investment in our network to fix pipes, upgrade our sewage treatment works, and maintain high-quality drinking water.
"We remain of the view that a market-led solution is in the best interest of customers, UK taxpayers and the wider economy."
TWUH and its Class A creditors had opposed the appeal, with Tom Smith KC, for TWUH, stating in written submissions that the London court should not interfere with the decision "unless compelled to do so".
Andrew Thornton KC, for TWL, previously told the Court of Appeal in written submissions that the approved plan was "designed by senior lenders for the benefit of senior lenders".
He said that the terms of the plan were "mispriced and inappropriate".
He continued that the judge, Mr Justice Leech, "failed to apply the correct principles" when making his decision to approve the scheme, and therefore "wrongly exercised his discretion to sanction the plan".
Thames Water serves about 16 million customers - about 25 per cent of the UK's population - and owns more than 20,000 miles of water mains and more than 68,000 miles of sewers across London, the Thames Valley and the Home Counties.
The High Court previously heard that the restructuring is intended to be an interim measure to keep the utility running before a substantive restructuring due later this year.
Before the decision, Colm Gibson, former head of economic regulation at the utility, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the company could collapse if the money is denied.
He said: "Thames will need to get financing from somewhere.
"If it can't arrange that finance to carry on it will inevitably end up in special administration.
"If the court says no then there's a real risk that Thames ends up in special administration in the next few weeks."
School inspector sacked for brushing water off child’s head wins legal battle
The welfare cuts could Labour announce tomorrow – from PIP to Universal Credit
What is the Online Safety Act? Law explained as it finally comes into force
Inside PIP: The ‘broken’ health benefit Labour could cut even further
