Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine, Empowering Congress

U.S. Supreme Court building is seen in Washington

The Supreme Court made a significant ruling this term that has major implications for the relationship between federal agencies, Congress, and the American people. In a case involving fishermen challenging a government agency mandate, the Court overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine. This doctrine, established in the 1980s, allowed courts to defer to agency interpretations of congressional authority when issuing regulations.

The 6-3 decision in favor of the fishermen marks a shift towards greater congressional oversight and accountability in rule-making. Critics of the Chevron doctrine argue that it gave too much power to unelected bureaucrats, leading to regulatory overreach and lack of clarity in laws.

With Chevron eliminated, Congress will now be compelled to draft laws with clearer language and less ambiguity. This move is expected to foster closer collaboration between the executive branch and Congress, ensuring that elected representatives have a more direct role in shaping policies that impact Americans' lives.

Decision in favor of fishermen signifies a move towards more clarity in laws.
Supreme Court overturned Chevron doctrine, shifting towards greater congressional oversight.
Elimination of Chevron doctrine compels Congress to draft laws with clearer language.

Following the Court's decision, Republicans in Congress are pushing for regulatory reforms to reduce executive red tape. Proposed legislation, such as the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act (REINS Act), aims to enhance congressional oversight of major rules proposed by federal agencies.

The REINS Act would require every new major rule to be approved by Congress before taking effect, ensuring that elected representatives have a say in significant regulatory decisions. This shift towards greater congressional involvement in rule-making reflects a broader effort to restore the constitutional separation of powers envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

In response to the Court's ruling, lawmakers are emphasizing the importance of reining in the power of federal agencies and upholding the principle of political accountability in lawmaking. By demanding greater scrutiny of regulations and promoting legislative oversight, Congress seeks to empower the American people and limit unchecked bureaucratic authority.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.