Supreme Court Declines Oil Companies' Appeal In Climate Lawsuits

The Supreme Court at sunset in Washington, Feb. 13, 2016. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick, File)

The Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will not hear an appeal from oil and gas companies seeking to block lawsuits holding the industry accountable for damages related to climate change. This decision comes amidst a series of legal actions across the U.S. and globally aimed at addressing climate change through the judicial system.

Various states, including California, Colorado, and New Jersey, have filed lawsuits against oil and gas companies, alleging deception regarding the role of fossil fuels in climate change. These lawsuits seek billions of dollars in damages for impacts such as wildfires, rising sea levels, and severe storms.

In Hawaii, companies like Sunoco and Shell appealed to the Supreme Court after losing a lawsuit brought by the city of Honolulu. Other major companies facing similar legal challenges include Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and BP.

States like California, Colorado, and New Jersey file lawsuits against oil and gas companies.

Supreme Court rejects appeal from oil and gas companies on climate change lawsuits.

Lawsuits seek damages for impacts of climate change like wildfires and rising sea levels.

Companies like Sunoco and Shell appeal to Supreme Court after losing lawsuits.

The companies argue that emissions are a national issue and should be litigated in federal court, where they have previously succeeded in having cases dismissed. Attorneys representing the companies emphasized the significant implications of these lawsuits on the energy industry.

The American Enterprise Institute expressed concerns that the refusal to hear the Honolulu case could open the door to more lawsuits from activists seeking to influence energy regulation through litigation.

The Biden administration, responding to the justices' request, supported keeping the case in state court for the time being, while acknowledging the potential for the companies to prevail in the future. The upcoming change in administration is expected to bring a shift in environmental and energy policies.

Despite recent setbacks for environmental regulations in the Supreme Court, with limitations placed on the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions and the halting of the agency's air pollution rules, Honolulu argued that state laws against deceptive marketing provide a strong basis for their case.

For more updates on the U.S. Supreme Court, visit AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court.