The Supreme Court has given the green light for a lawsuit filed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) against former New York state Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo. The unanimous decision by the Court overturns a previous ruling that dismissed the NRA's claims of free-speech rights violation.
The NRA alleges that Vullo used her position to pressure banks and insurance companies to blacklist the organization following the tragic school shooting in Parkland, Florida, in 2018, which resulted in the loss of 17 lives.
Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the NRA's case received support from the Biden administration, which argued in favor of allowing some of the claims to proceed.
Vullo, on the other hand, defended her actions by stating that she was justified in investigating NRA-endorsed insurance policies that were dubbed as 'murder insurance.' She maintained that her warnings about the risks associated with conducting business with gun advocacy groups were legitimate and that she did not exert any inappropriate influence on the companies, many of which had already begun distancing themselves from the NRA independently at the time.
This development marks a significant step in the legal battle between the NRA and Vullo, shedding light on the complex intersection of free speech rights, government oversight, and the regulation of financial services in the context of gun advocacy organizations.
For more updates on the U.S. Supreme Court, visit AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court.
