THE UK will crack down further on refugees in the coming months regardless of who enters Downing Street, after both Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak pledged fresh measures to tighten rules.
The campaign so far had seen both candidates re-commit to the Government’s Rwanda asylum scheme, over which the UK currently stands to lose the £120 million it has paid to Rwanda if the plan to deport migrants is ruled unlawful by the courts.
Both candidates defended the policy, despite officials from the east African nation’s government confirming this week it had received the entire initial payment for the agreement signed in April and that the funds are already “committed”, with some money spent on preparations for arrivals.
The first deportation flight was grounded in June after a series of legal challenges, and another attempt is yet to be scheduled.
Calling it the “right” policy, Truss also indicated that the scheme could be extended further to more countries.
“I’m determined to see it through to full implementation, as well as exploring other countries that we can work on similar partnerships with. It’s the right thing to do,” she told the Mail on Sunday.
“I’m also determined to make sure that we have the right level of forces at our border. I’m going to increase the border force to make sure that we have the proper protection in place directly at the border.”
Sunak made a similar pledge, with his campaign promising to do “whatever it takes” for the scheme to succeed. Sunak also committed to an annual cap on the number of refugees.
He would also see the UK threaten to limit aid, trade terms and visa options if a country was unwilling to co-operate with the return of failed asylum seekers.
Sunak pledged to bring in "enhanced powers" to detain, tag and monitor those entering the UK outside of established safe routes.
On the first weekend since Tory MPs whittled down the candidates to the final two, Sunak travelled to Margaret Thatcher’s birthplace of Grantham in Lincolnshire where he stressed his “common sense” Thatcherite credentials and labelled the tax plans of Truss “immoral”.
His concerns were backed up by Tory grandees Chris Patten, Norman Lamont and Malcolm Rifkind, who told The Observer that Thatcher would not have approved of cutting taxes to curb inflation.
Patten told the newspaper: “Margaret Thatcher was a fiscal Conservative who did not cut tax until we had reduced inflation. She was honest and did not believe in nonsense.”
But Truss, during a visit to party members in Kent, once again defended her plans for potentially £30 billion of tax cuts, saying: “I think it is wrong to be taking money from people that we don’t need to take, when people across the country are struggling with the cost-of-living crisis.”
The Foreign Secretary will hope to win backing for her proposals on illegal migration, as she told the Mail on Sunday that “Britain’s borders will be protected” under her leadership.
According to the paper, she would increase Border Force staff levels from 9000 to 10,800 and would also bring forward a strengthened UK Bill of Rights to provide a “sound legal basis” to tackle migration.
“I’m determined to end the appalling people trafficking we’re seeing,” she told the paper.
“I make sure things get done, and I will be working with my colleagues to deliver this as an absolute priority.
“I understand it’s a priority for people and we need to make sure our immigration system is fair, and this illegal immigration that we’re seeing across the Channel is both unfair and incredibly dangerous, and it is one of my priorities to make sure it is sorted.
“I know from my work as Foreign Secretary that there are more countries who we want to work with and we will be moving forward on those efforts very strongly under my leadership.”
On immigration, Sunak offers voters a 10-point plan that will include a commitment to a narrower definition of who qualifies for asylum compared to that offered by the European Convention on Human Rights.
“Our immigration system is broken and we have to be honest about that. Whether you believe that migration should be high or low, we can all agree that it should be legal and controlled,” Sunak said.
“Right now the system is chaotic, with law-abiding citizens seeing boats full of illegal immigrants coming from the safe country of France with our sailors and coastguards seemingly powerless to stop them.
“It must stop, and if I am prime minister I will stop it.”
Top on his agenda as the next prime minister, according to Sunak, will be a meeting with French president Emmanuel Macron to find a solution to small boat crossings, which he also suggests should be tackled with a new cross-Government taskforce.
Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Sunak says: “The ECHR cannot inhibit our ability to properly control our borders and we shouldn’t let it. We need to inject a healthy dose of common sense into the system, and that is what my plan does.”
Roza Salih (below, left), an SNP councillor in Glasgow who this year became the first former refugee elected to the city's council, said Tory attacks on refugee rights are an attack on everyone's rights.
"They want us divided," she told The National.
"Unfortunately Scotland does not have any powers yet on immigration, which I am fighting for. The current immigration system is broken."
She added: "We are isolating asylum seekers instead of investing and helping them to integrate and contribute to our society."
Meanwhile, SNP MSP Michelle Thomson said: “It seems a change of leader will mean the nasty party will just get nastier.
“As they compete for votes from their members, Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss are trying to outdo each other on who will do the least to help those violence, persecution and war. It’s disgusting, but sadly unsurprising.
“Here in Scotland we will continue to do all we can to welcome refugees from across the world, with open arms.
“It’s clear that independence is essential if we are to ensure a humane approach to refugees and asylum, and an immigration system that is tailored to Scotland’s needs.”
And Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer said the rhetoric was "sadly predictable", noting that the leadership contenders were "competing to be the cruellest towards some of the world's most vulnerable people".
“The Tories can no longer claim ignorance about the immediate and significant dangers the Rwanda scheme poses, with recent accusations that Rwanda has been using refugees to engage in armed combat in neighbouring countries," he told The National.
“Warnings have come from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and even the UK High Commissioner to Rwanda and within the UK Foreign Office.
“Scotland desperately needs power over asylum processes, so we can escape these cruel and racist policies, and develop safe routes for those in need.”
The latest pitches from the candidates comes as new polling by Opinium suggests that voters are largely split between Truss and Sunak, with 43% believing that Sunak would be a good prime minister compared to 36% for the Foreign Secretary.
Both still have time to make an impression on the public, with the pair set to face off in a televised BBC debate on Monday, followed by another debate on Tuesday hosted by The Sun and TalkTV.
Sunak and Truss have also signed up for a Sky debate on August 4.
