During the recent legal proceedings involving Stormy Daniels and former President Donald Trump, Trump's attorney Susan Necheles questioned Daniels about her decision to sell her story despite claiming to be afraid after receiving threats. Necheles suggested that Daniels may not have been genuinely scared, pointing out that she chose to pursue selling her story despite the alleged threats.
In response, Daniels maintained that she was indeed terrified but had to adjust her approach due to the changing circumstances, particularly Trump's candidacy for the presidency. She explained that she viewed the situation as a 'new ballgame' and needed to adapt her strategy accordingly.
Necheles pressed further, insinuating that Daniels' actions were driven by a desire for financial gain rather than fear. Daniels refuted this claim, emphasizing that her primary motivation was to share her story rather than profit from it. She clarified that she did not assign a monetary value to her account but instead saw it as an opportunity to bring her experiences to light.
The exchange between Necheles and Daniels sheds light on the complex dynamics at play in the legal dispute between the two parties. As the proceedings continue, both sides are presenting their perspectives on the events that transpired, with each seeking to assert their position and defend their actions.
