Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

States Sue Trump Administration Over Public Health Research Funding Cuts

Donald Trump Former U.S. President and current Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's rally in Sioux City

On Monday, nearly two dozen states took legal action against the Trump administration, filing a lawsuit over cuts to public health research funding. The lawsuit, spearheaded by 22 Democratic attorneys general, alleges that the proposed cuts will result in the abrupt loss of hundreds of millions of dollars that are already committed to supporting tens of thousands of researchers and other workers. This move is expected to halt numerous life-saving health research projects and cutting-edge technology initiatives.

The complaint further argues that the impact of cutting funding will not be limited to the public sector but will also have ripple effects into the private sector. The states involved in the lawsuit are seeking a temporary restraining order to pause the proposed cuts, adding to the growing number of legal challenges against President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape the federal government.

At the center of the dispute is a plan to cap funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for indirect cost rates at 15%, down from an average of over 27%. Some research institutions, such as Harvard, currently have rates exceeding 60%. The NIH estimates that implementing this policy would result in annual savings of more than $4 billion.

Proposed cuts threaten loss of hundreds of millions in research funding.
22 Democratic attorneys general lead lawsuit against Trump administration.
Legal action aims to pause cuts affecting public health research.

Indirect cost rates are designed to cover various overhead expenses, including facility costs, regulatory compliance, and administrative support, necessary to support research activities. The lawsuit warns that if the administration's plans to cut these rates proceed, it could lead to a significant slowdown in cutting-edge research aimed at curing and treating human diseases.

The US Department of Health and Human Services, the parent agency of the NIH, has defended its authority to implement these changes. The White House also supported the new policy, stating that redirecting funds away from administrative expenses would free up more resources for legitimate scientific research.

As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the future of public health research funding in the United States.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.