Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Wales Online
Wales Online
National
Solent News Agency & Matt Jackson

Stagecoach bus driver loses sex discrimination case

A Stagecoach driver has lost a sex discrimination case after her boss told her 'I feel sorry for your husband' during a heated argument. When Ann-Marie Carreras replied that she wasn't married, manager Edward Henley-Burns replied: 'I'm not surprised', an employment tribunal heard.

The divorcee tried to sue employers, Stagecoach, claiming that by referring to her husband she was being treated unfairly. But the tribunal found that while 'ill advised and unprofessional' the comment that could 'equally have been said to a man in the same way' for example 'saying to a (heterosexual) man, “I feel sorry for your wife”.'

The hearing in Reading, Berkshire, was told that Ms Carreras has been working as a bus driver for Stagecoach West, working at their Banbury depot in Oxfordshire since November 2017. In October 2019, she was called to a meeting with her manager to discuss three customer complaints they had been made about her.

The issues Mr Henley-Burns wanted to discuss were a complaint about driving, failing to stop for a passenger and a complaint by a customer about an interaction with the her on the bus. During the discussion he advised her to 'try to avoid being argumentative with customers,' the tribunal was told.

The meeting then descended into a 'heated argument'. Ms Carreras responded to her manager's advice saying: 'My ex-husband always said I think before I speak,' to which Mr Henley-Burns said: 'I feel sorry for your husband,' the panel heard.

When she said that she was divorced, Mr Henley-Burns remarked: 'I'm not surprised'. Two days later the bus driver raised a grievance about the meeting and was signed off sick until January 2020.

In her absence Mr Henley-Burns was told by Stagecoach that his comment about her not being married was unacceptable and he wrote her an apology. Ms Carreras and the company made an arrangement for her to return to work on days when her boss would not be present at the depot.

This worked well for several weeks until the Covid-19 pandemic intervened and she was put on furlough in April 2020, the tribunal heard. However, while she was furloughed Mr Henley-Burns was appointed manager of Banbury depot and Ms Carreras was told the arrangement could not continue.

She complained but was told it was inevitable that she and her boss would be on the premises at the same time. In November Ms Carreras resigned, saying that the company's failure to adhere to the agreement meant that she 'did not feel safe and secure' at work.

The bus driver took Stagecoach West's parent company - Thames Transit - to the tribunal claiming that she had been the victim of sex discrimination, sex harassment and constructive unfair dismissal. She claimed Mr Henley-Burns had not allowed her to speak at the meeting, falsely accused her of an accident which she had nothing to do with, and called her 'argumentative.'

The bus driver also said that the 'I am sorry for your husband' and 'I am not surprised' comments were sex discrimination and harassment. Ms Carreras also claimed that she had been unfairly dismissed because the comments made about her by Mr Henley-Burns made her decide to leave.

All of the bus driver's claims however, were dismissed by the employment tribunal. The panel ruled that Ms Carreras's sex claims were unfounded because there was 'no evidence that a man... would have been treated any differently by Mr Henley-Burns.'

The panel also concluded that the bus driver had not been unfairly dismissed because she resigned, and was not dismissed by her employer. Employment Judge Emma Hawksworth said: "We accept entirely that the incident on 1 October 2019 was extremely upsetting for [Ms Carreras.]

"The meeting was not handled well, and the comments made at the end of it were ill advised and unprofessional and were not on any basis funny or jovial. However, we have not found that anything that happened at that meeting met the legal tests that we have to apply.

"We have thought about this very carefully. We have concluded that there was no evidence that a man in the same circumstances was or would have been treated any differently by Mr Henley-Burns.

"There is a reference to gender built into the word 'husband' but we felt that was a comment that could equally have been said to a man in the same way, such as by saying to a (heterosexual) man, “I feel sorry for your wife”.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.