Special Counsel Robert Hur appeared before the committee to testify on the investigation findings regarding the removal and retention of classified documents at the Penn-Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement. Hur, a seasoned legal professional with a background in the Department of Justice, provided insights into the investigation process and the decision-making behind recommending or not recommending criminal charges.
Hur highlighted the thorough and independent nature of the investigation, emphasizing the need to adhere to departmental policies and practices. He explained that while evidence was found indicating that President Biden had retained classified materials after his vice presidency, it did not meet the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the decision not to recommend criminal charges.
During his testimony, Hur addressed the issue of the President's memory and mental state, emphasizing the importance of assessing these factors in determining willful intent. He clarified that his report to the Attorney General included a detailed analysis of the evidence, including considerations of how a jury might perceive the President's memory and mental state in a criminal trial.
Hur also discussed the comparison made between the investigation findings regarding President Biden and former President Trump, highlighting the need to evaluate each case based on its unique facts and circumstances. He encouraged individuals to read the report for a comprehensive understanding of the analysis conducted.
Throughout his testimony, Hur expressed gratitude to the team of attorneys, agents, analysts, and staff who assisted in the investigation, acknowledging their dedication and professionalism. He specifically thanked Deputy Special Counsel Mark Krikbaum for his valuable contributions to the task.
In conclusion, Hur reiterated his commitment to serving the country with fairness and impartiality, emphasizing the importance of upholding the standards of the Justice Department. He welcomed questions from the committee members to provide further clarification on the investigation findings.
