Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

South African President Responds To Trump's Aid Threat

South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa addresses the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa responded on Monday to US President Donald Trump’s threat to cut off aid over the alleged mistreatment of White farmers, denying Trump’s claim that authorities were “confiscating land.” Ramaphosa emphasized that South Africa is a constitutional democracy deeply rooted in the rule of law, justice, and equality, and clarified that the government has not confiscated any land.

Ramaphosa expressed readiness to engage with the Trump administration on land reform policy and other bilateral interests. He noted that while the US is a significant political and trade partner, it does not provide substantial funding to South Africa apart from a major HIV/AIDS relief program.

Trump's recent threat to halt future funding until allegations of land confiscation and mistreatment are investigated is not new. The issue stems from South Africa's history of racist land policies that favored White farmers, leading to the displacement of Black and non-White South Africans. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, the country has had provisions for land redistribution and restitution in its constitution.

South Africa is a constitutional democracy rooted in the rule of law.
Ramaphosa denies land confiscation allegations by Trump.
Land redistribution efforts in South Africa post-apartheid aim for justice.

Despite these efforts, challenges persist, with high levels of unemployment and poverty among Black South Africans who own only a small fraction of the land. In January, Ramaphosa signed a bill into law outlining new guidelines for land expropriation, allowing the government to take land without compensation in certain cases.

Ramaphosa clarified that the law is not a tool for confiscation but a legal process aimed at ensuring equitable and just access to land as outlined in the constitution. However, constitutional safeguards against expropriation without compensation remain in place, and legal experts anticipate potential challenges if the ruling party moves to implement the policy.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.