Special counsel Jack Smith’s team on Tuesday pushed back against an order the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case.
Smith and Trump’s lawyers submitted proposed jury instructions in response to an unusual order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon based on competing interpretations of the Presidential Records Act. The PRA requires a president to turn over his documents to the National Archives upon leaving office but Trump has claimed it gives him the right to deem government records as personal property.
Smith’s team in a filing said the jury instructions were based on a “fundamentally flawed legal premise” and asked the Trump-appointed judge to rule before a trial so he can appeal if the court rules against him because any jury instructions that include the PRA would “distort the trial.”
“The PRA’s distinction between personal and presidential records has no bearing on whether a former President’s possession of documents containing national defense information is authorized under the Espionage Act, and the PRA should play no role in the jury instructions,” Smith said in the filing. “Indeed, based on the current record, the PRA should not play any role at trial at all.”
Prosecutors are emphatic: Trump's treatment of presidential/personal records is both a "fiction" he invented belatedly (at urging of Tom Fitton) to justify keeping records he was plainly not authorized to have.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) April 3, 2024
And whether he designated them 'personal' is irrelevant. pic.twitter.com/oH4DEartKW
“Things just got very real in the classified documents prosecution,” tweeted New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman, citing Smith’s threat to appeal in response to “Cannon’s outlandish jury instructions.”
Things just got very real in the classified documents prosecution.
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) April 3, 2024
DOJ calls out Judge Cannon's outlandish jury instructions as destructive to a genuine trial.
Asks court to rule now to give government opportunity to appeal and seek mandamus.
With strong precedents in hand.⬇️ pic.twitter.com/OEk8FvDSBd
Smith “just threw down the gauntlet” by threatening to immediately appeal if Cannon rules against him to “avoid a miscarriage of justice at trial,” wrote former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti.
“To make this crystal clear, if trial begins and Judge Cannon makes a ruling that is legally erroneous *in the middle of the trial*, resulting in a not guilty verdict, prosecutors *cannot* appeal the verdict,” he explained. “That's why Jack Smith wants a ruling before trial, so he can appeal.”
To make this crystal clear, if trial begins and Judge Cannon makes a ruling that is legally erroneous *in the middle of the trial*, resulting in a not guilty verdict, prosecutors *cannot* appeal the verdict.
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) April 3, 2024
That's why Jack Smith wants a ruling before trial, so he can appeal. https://t.co/JcZumOs0zB
National security attorney Bradley Moss said the Smith filing “puts Cannon on notice that he has had enough.”
“The PRA angle is a question of law, not fact, and if she believes Trump’s PRA defense she should grant his motion and let Smith take this to the 11th circuit already,” he wrote.
Trump’s team also submitted proposed jury instructions that read like a “’Choose Your Own Adventure’ that always leads you to ‘Not guilty,’” tweeted Politico’s Kyle Cheney.
Meanwhile, Trump's proposed jury instructions are like a "Choose Your Own Adventure" that always leads you to "Not guilty." https://t.co/T5QtESRDMt pic.twitter.com/4liLDaFc1B
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) April 3, 2024
Trump’s team said that Cannon’s instructions are consistent with the former president’s position that the “prosecution is based on official acts” he took as president rather than the illegal retention of materials.
“You heard evidence during the trial that President Trump exercised that authority, at times verbally and at times without using formal procedures, while he was President,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in the hypothetical jury instructions. “I instruct you that those declassification decisions are examples of valid and legally appropriate uses of President Trump’s declassification authority while he was President of the United States.”
Trump’s team essentially used the jury instructions to “reassert supposed bases for dismissal,” explained former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman.
“Cannon is definitely in a pickle, but has nobody to blame but herself for it,” he wrote.
“The Mar-a-Lago case remains the steepest legal challenge Trump faces,” Mariotti tweeted. “Absolutely devastating evidence that is almost impossible for Trump to overcome. That’s why he is trying to delay and is making absurd arguments about the Presidential Records Act.”
The Mar-a-Lago case remains the steepest legal challenge Trump faces.
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) April 3, 2024
Absolutely devastating evidence that is almost impossible for Trump to overcome.
That’s why he is trying to delay and is making absurd arguments about the Presidential Records Act. https://t.co/q9aYhserdw
