The fight to keep a key court judgment secret in the case of Bernard Collaery has continued despite the new federal government dropping his prosecution.
The Canberra lawyer had been facing charges for four years after he was accused of leaking classified information about an alleged Australian spying operation in East Timor.
Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus dropped the prosecution upon Labor taking office.
But Mr Dreyfus is continuing the fight of his predecessor Michaelia Cash to further redact the judgment that ruled the case need not be heard in near total secrecy.
Chief Justice Lucy McCallum told the ACT Supreme Court on Friday the principle came down to "a tension between transparency and secrecy".
"You say that national security trumps transparency but there's a pretty strong argument the other way," she said, addressing the attorney-general's senior counsel Perry Herzfeld.
"Ultimately, the administration of justice must be transparent."
Chief Justice McCallum has reserved her decision.
The attorney-general's office did not reply to a request for comment.
Human Rights Law Centre senior lawyer Kieran Pender said the government needed to give up the secrecy fight.
"It was a landmark win for open justice. But that judgment saying no to a secret trial has still not seen the light of day," he said.
"Rather than fighting to keep parts of the judgment secret, the new government should end this absurd pursuit of secrecy."
Mr Pender also called for greater whistleblower protections.
"The attorney-general has bigger priorities than continuing the secrecy obsession of the former government," he said.
It comes after a review by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor Grant Donaldson cautioned against secret trials after the case of the former military intelligence officer dubbed Witness J wasn't disclosed publicly.
His case only came to light after he launched a court challenge against the prison for tipping off police about a memoir he was writing.
