A Scottish man has successfully pushed for his neighbours 40ft trees to be chopped down, claiming he was unable to grow plants because of them.
Ker Hamilton, who lives in Balgowan, said that William Buchan’s trees were making his life a misery. Hamilton said the spruce trees blocked sunlight to his detached property, adding they also impacted his children playing in the garden after school.
Hamilton looked to Perth and Kinross Council in a bid to have the trees lopped. They ruled in his favour and ordered the two trees be completely removed while 15 cypress trees were to be reduced in height, according to the Daily Record.
READ MORE - Edinburgh gangster chopped off local dad-to-be's hand - mistaking him for rival
They also told Buchan to shorten the length of branches encroaching on Hamilton's property. Buchan appealed the council decision to the Scottish Government and claimed the work he was required to do on encroaching branches was 'excessive'.
But a government reporter has upheld the original ruling. Hamilton said: "The hedge obviously has a major impact on the garden particularly during the late afternoon and early evening when the children are home from school and most people expect to be able to enjoy their garden."
A report from the council said Hamilton had told them: "The applicant has advised that the living room at the house frontage is affected by the hedge, and that the neighbouring trees affect light levels at the west elevation of the property, which has the bathroom window on the first floor."
Sign up to Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
It added he had highlighted the towering trees caused 'very limited' light, no grass growth, no light into his bathroom, a 'danger' to property and possibly life and should be considered a health and safety risk.
Launching his appeal, Buchan said: "Perth and Kinross Council are wishing us to reduce the length of remaining encroaching branches of the same trees that extend into the applicant's garden by 50-60 percent.
"From what I have managed to find on the internet, it states that the neighbour has the right to reduce the encroaching branches on his side of the hedge, but I cannot find any legislation which states that it is the responsibility of the owner of the trees to have to make this reduction."
Rejecting the appeal bid, government reporter Fortune Gumbo said: "The council's requirement for the hedge owner to be responsible for reducing the encroaching parts of the hedge, in addition to the other requirements that the appellant does not seem to object to, is not excessive and is based on the act.
"The fact that the neighbour may have the right to remove those encroaching branches does not alter the need to stipulate those actions in the notice. While there may be effects on the health of the trees that remain after the actions are carried out, I do not consider the risk that this could occur to outweigh the need to reduce the adverse effect of the hedge on the neighbouring property."
READ NEXT:
Edinburgh Airport car parking prices including drop off and fast track options
Edinburgh cocktail bar owner took part in police chase after undercover cop sting
New Edinburgh housing scheme on site of former care home set to go ahead
The idyllic castle you can stay in near Edinburgh named one of 'UK's most romantic'
Edinburgh holidaymakers warned of 10-week passport wait times
