Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - US
The Guardian - US
World
Rachel Leingang (now) and Maya Yang (earlier)

Rudy Giuliani defamation trial: jury deliberating on damages for former election workers – as it happened

Rudy Giuliani speaks with reporters at a federal courthouse in May
Rudy Giuliani speaks with reporters at a federal courthouse in May Photograph: Patrick Semansky/AP

Jurors have been dismissed for the day in the Rudy Giuliani defamation trial, meaning there won’t be a verdict just yet. They will return tomorrow at 9am to deliberate.

Key moments from the court case this week

In case you missed some of the court action, here are some highlights from this week…

  • Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss both testified about the disastrous effects of lies spread by Rudy Giuliani and others who put them at the center of an election conspiracy theory. They shared examples of the racist, harassing, threatening messages they received after being publicly named by election deniers.

  • Freeman said she had to leave her home for safety reasons. She hired a lawyer to help keep her name off any home-related documents for her new place. She feels like she’s lost who she is, her good name, in this web.

  • Moss detailed how these actions made her anxious to even leave the house and caused her son to get harassed, eventually failing his classes. She said she still doesn’t really go out.

  • Giuliani was initially expected to testify. But after two separate incidents of him doubling down, his team did not put him on the stand. His lawyer said the women had been through enough, but also pointed to Gateway Pundit, the rightwing media outlet, as more culpable for the harassment.

  • Ashlee Humphreys, a professor from Northwestern University and an expert witness of Freeman and Moss, walked through the significant reputational damage done to Freeman and Moss, showing how their names are now associated with election fraud.

  • Freeman and Moss’ lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, said they hope the case sends a clear message to people launching smear campaigns not to do it.

  • The jury is now deliberating over the amount of damages to award Freeman and Moss, as the judge has already decided Giuliani defamed them. The award could be as much as $43 million.

Updated

As we await the jury, a reminder of what’s at stake for Rudy Giuliani…

Most obviously, Giuliani could be on the hook for massive financial damages for defaming Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. The jury has the ability to award up to $43 million. It’s unclear whether Giuliani has the kind of money – he didn’t turn over documents that would’ve shown his financial state.

As a reminder, the judge in this case has already decided Giuliani defamed the former elections workers. The jury is deciding how much that should cost him.

Beyond the money, the case serves as a harbinger for other defamation cases that seek to hold people or entities spreading election lies accountable. And beyond this case, Giuliani faces criminal charges in the sprawling Georgia election subversion case.

Giuliani’s legacy – whatever was left of it after the past few years – will be cemented by these cases. As the Daily Beast’s Jose Pagliery wrote in a piece about Giuliani’s rough circumstances today: “For Giuliani, 2023 will likely end in penniless defeat. But 2024 could be even worse—it could actually end with him in prison.”

Chuck Schumer has praised the Senate’s passage of the National Defense Authorization Act and criticized what he called the “partisan race to the bottom we’re seeing at in the House.”

In a tweet on Thursday, Schumer went on to say:

“While the Senate is strengthening American national security, House Republicans are wasting time on a clown-car impeachment inquiry that will go nowhere.”

As we wait for the jury deliberations to complete in Rudy Giuliani’s federal defamation trial, the leaders of the House and Senate have issued two very different statements on the border crisis.

In a tweet on Thursday, House speaker Mike Johnson wrote:

“The border is not just a crisis, it’s a catastrophe. The House took action to secure our border. It’s time for the Senate and the White House to do the same.”

Meanwhile, Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer wrote:

“Republicans say action on the border is urgent. If they’re serious about getting something done, they should not be so eager to go home. There is a lot of work left to do.”

Speaking of Donald Trump’s mounting legal issues, his defense in the 2020 federal election interference case may get a boost from the supreme court.

The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell reports:

A decision by the US supreme court to take a case linked to the January 6 attack on the Capitol could have consequences altering the trajectory of the criminal case against Donald Trump over his effort to overturn the 2020 election as well as for hundreds of other people prosecuted for the riot.

The nation’s highest court has agreed to consider whether federal prosecutors can charge January 6 riot defendants with a statute that makes it a crime to obstruct an official proceeding of Congress – a charge also filed against Trump in his 2020 election interference case.

The decision by the conservative-dominated court to take up the matter complicates and could delay Trump’s trial in federal district court in Washington, which is currently scheduled for next March.

For the full story, click here:

Meanwhile, Rudy Giuliani’s former boss, Donald Trump, is once again claiming that he is part of a “witch hunt.”

Posting on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump wrote:

“Biden had 150 Suspicious Activity Reports!!! I never had one!!! As the media has reported, my banks were thrilled with me as a customer, yet I get sued by the Racist A.G. of New York State. WITCH HUNT!”

Trump has been indicted four times, including on cases surrounding the 2020 federal election interference, the Georgia state election interference, classified documents found at his Florida Mar-a-Lago resort, and hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

With the jury in deliberations, here is the Guardian’s Sam Levine’s report on the plaintiffs’ plea to award them each with $24m in damages to repair their reputations:

A Washington DC jury should “send a message” to other powerful people by granting substantial damages award against Rudy Giuliani for spreading lies about two Georgia election workers, a lawyer for the pair said.

“The message is don’t do it,” Michael Gottlieb, a lawyer representing Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss, said in his closing statement to eight jurors on the fourth day of the defamation case. “They say when someone shows you who they are, believe them. Mr Giuliani has shown us over and over and over again that he will not take our clients names out of his mouth. Facts do not and will not stop him.

“He’s telegraphing that he will do this again. Believe him,” he said.

For the full story, click here:

Federal judge Beryl Howell said that usually the upper boundary of permissible punitive damage is four times the compensatory damages, the Guardian’s Sam Levine reports.

Both Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss are asking the jury to award $24m to each of them in compensatory damages.

Jury deliberations have officially begun

Jury deliberations have officially begun in Rudy Giuliani’s federal defamation case. The Guardian’s Sam Levine reports on the three categories of damages sought by Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss:

There are three categories of damages that Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss are asking for in their federal lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani: compensatory damages, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages.

The compensatory damages are what the jury feels is necessary to repair the damages to the reputation Freeman and Moss suffered because of 16 defamatory statements Giuliani made about them. The two women are asking the jury to award $24m each in that category alone.

The damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress are designed to separately compensate Freeman and Moss for emotional damage they suffered as a result of Giuliani’s statements. The plaintiffs simply asked the jury to use their best judgment there.

Lastly, punitive damages are supposed to be an additional punishment for Giuliani for his reckless conduct. The plaintiffs did not ask the jury for a specific amount, but asked the jury to choose a number that would “send a message” to deter other powerful people from engaging in similar conduct.

Updated

US district judge Beryl Howell told the jury that the court has already found that the defendants’ statements harmed plaintiffs, the Guardian’s Sam Levine reports.

Howell went on to tell jurors that it is their job to quantify that harm.

During closing arguments, the plaintiffs’ lawyer Michael Gottleib pushed back against Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers who claimed that Giuliani should not be defined by what has happened in recent times.

“This case is not about Rudy Giulani is or what he did in his past. It’s about what he did. What he did to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss… It’s not about the Yankees and 9/11 or the US attorneys office and taking on the mob,” Gottlieb said.

Closing arguments completed

Closing arguments have now been completed in Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial and US district judge Beryl Howell is reading instructions to the jury.

Overall, the plaintiffs are asking for at least $24m in damages for Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. They asked the jury to use their discretion to decide how much in additional damages to wayward.

Michael Gottlieb, a lawyer for the pair, asked the jury to award an amount that would “send a message” to powerful figures who are seeking to spread lies about ordinary people like Moss and Freeman.

In his own closing, Joeseph Sibley asked the jury to give a lesser award that was directly related to the documented amount of money the two women had lost.

He also sought to distance Giuliani from the violent threats the women faced, placing the responsibility instead on the Gateway Pundit. “More likely than not, this is the party that sort of doxed these women,” he said.

And he also asked the jury to judge Giuliani based not just on his conduct towards Moss and Freeman, but based on the totality of his career.

He said:

“Rudy Giuliani is a good man. I know that some of you may not think that. He hasn’t exactly helped himself with some of the things that have happened in the last few days,” he said. “The idea of him being a racist, or him encouraging racist activity, that’s really a low blow. That’s not who he is. He overcame negative stereotypes.”

Defense's lawyer: Racist and violent vitriol does not 'naturally flow' from Rudy Giuliani

Speaking about Rudy Giuliani, his lawyer Joseph Sibley said, “If he actually encouraged violence against these women, one would hope he would be in jail but that’s not what he did,” Law & Crime’s Brandi Buchman reports.

He went on to add that racist and violent vitriol does not “naturally flow” from Giuliani, Buchman reports.

Sibley also said that Giuliani “is a good man,” adding, “I know some of you may not think that.”

Updated

The defense has begun its closing arguments.

Joseph Sibley, Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, told the court that the plaintiffs’ are asking “to award a catastrophic amount of damages against my client,” Law & Crime’s Brandi Buchman reports.

“When you see my client’s state of mind, you’re going to say, you should have been better but weren’t as bad as the plaintiffs make you out to be,” he said.

Sibley added that Giuliani “showed up, it’s not like he completely didn’t participate in the litigation,” Buchman reports.

Updated

Michael Gottlieb, one of the lawyers representing Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, has just completed his closing argument.

In his final remarks, he asked the jury to send a message to other powerful people with whatever punitive damages it chose to levy against Rudy Giuliani.

“The message is, ‘Don’t do it,’” he said. “He has no right to offer defenseless civil servants up to a virtual mob in order to overturn an election.”

Gottlieb asked the jury to award Freeman and Moss $24m each in damages to repair the damage to their reputation from 16 defamatory statements Giuliani made about them.

He asked the jury to use their discretion to determine punitive damages as well as much how much to award for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

“Ruby Giuliani used his power to scapegoat Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss,” he said. “He didn’t see them as human beings.”

Joe Sibley, Giuliani’s lawyer, is about to begin his closing statement.

Michael Gottlieb, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, said that he will not provide the jury with a number for damages to be paid, Law & Crime’s Brandi Buchman reports.

Instead, he said that they must reach that number by weighing the humiliation, indignity and suffering Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss experienced based on the evidence provided.

He went on to say that the cycle of shame faced by Freeman and Moss is “tragic.”

One of the plaintiffs’ lawyers brought out a copy of Rudy Giuliani’s book Leadership during the closing arguments, Law & Crime’s Brandi Buchman reports.

The lawyer pointed to a chapter called Stand Up to Bullies and quoted from it, saying, “Never pick on someone smaller than you. Never be a bully.”

“Those are wise words. If only Mr. Giuliani had listened,” the lawyer said, Buchman reports.

Plaintiffs' lawyer: 'After everything they went through, they stood up and said no more'

Michael Gottlieb, a lawyer for Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, is beginning his closing arguments in the case.

“You now know how important names are to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, but you now know each of them amount to much more than their names,” he told the jury.

He added:

“Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, it turns out are miles and miles away from ordinary. They are heroes. After everything they went through, they stood up and they said no more. They opened themselves up to you and the public, and unlike some other people, they testified here under oath.”

Giuliani had been expected to testify in the case, but his lawyer reversed and said he would not on Friday.

Updated

Court to begin closing arguments

The court will begin closing arguments, the Guardian’s Sam Levine reports from the courthouse in Washington DC.

Rudy Giuliani will no longer testify.

With Rudy Giuliani deciding that he will no longer testify in the federal defamation trial, here is Giuliani responding to a question from a reporter yesterday on whether he still planned to testify today:

Giuliani replied:

“I said, the truth will come out, the truth will come out. I didn’t say when so it will come out and it will come out very very shortly… But I’m not going to comment on the courtroom, I’m not supposed to.”

Rudy Giuliani will not testify

In a surprise development, Rudy Giuliani will not testify, according to his lawyers.

The court is set to go straight into closing statements, the Guardian’s Sam Levine reports from the courthouse in Washington DC.

Following Wednesday’s court hearing, Rudy Giuliani thanked him supporters for their “encouragement” and vowed to “continue to tell the truth.”

In July, Giuliani admitted to making false statements about Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss.

A court filing stated that Giuliani “does not dispute for purposes of this litigation that the statements carry meaning that is defamatory per se” and goes on to argue that his statements are constitutionally protected free speech.

As we wait for the trial to get underway, here is the latest polling update on Rudy Giuliani’s former boss Donald Trump:

According to a new Bloomberg poll released on Thursday, Trump is leading Joe Biden in seven swing states.

Bloomberg reports:

Eleven months before the election, Trump is leading Biden by 5 percentage points among registered voters in a head-to-head matchup across seven swing states. Trump’s lead is inside the margin of error in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, but is larger in Georgia and North Carolina. The poll had a margin of error of 1 percentage point for all seven states combined and between 3 and 5 percentage points for individual states.

With Rudy Giuliani set to testify in federal court on Thursday, here is the Guardian’s Sam Levine – who has been reporting from the courthouse – on the significance of this closely watched defamation case:

Rudy Giuliani is set to testify on Thursday in a federal defamation case to determine how much he should have to pay two Atlanta election workers he spread false statements about after the 2020 election.

Giuliani’s testimony will cap a closely-watched week-long defamation case. It comes after the two Black workers, Shaye Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman, gave harrowing testimony about how Giuliani’s lies upended their lives. Among other things, Moss said she is afraid to go anywhere alone and Freeman said she is afraid to give anyone her name and still wears a mask and sunglasses in public so she won’t be recognized. They are seeking $15.5m to $43m in damages from Giuliani.

It’s not clear how the former New York City mayor will defend himself. He has already conceded that he made false statements the two workers and Beryl Howell, the US district judge, has already found him liable for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy. The only question for the eight-member jury is how much to award in damages.

For the full story, click here:

Rudy Giuliani set to testify in defamation trial

Rudy Giuliani is set to testify on Thursday in the closely watched federal defamation trial involving two former Atlanta election workers he spread defamatory and false statements about following the 2020 presidential election.

The testimony from Donald Trump’s former lawyer will follow the harrowing testimonies delivered earlier this week by Shaye Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman, both of whom described the long-lasting impacts Giuliani’s lies have had on their lives.

On Tuesday, Moss told the court that after Giuliani falsely accused her of fraudulently counting mail-in ballots, she prays on most days that “God does not wake me up and I just disappear.” She added that she often fears that her son will come home from school and discover her and his grandmother hanging from a tree in their yard.

Freeman’s testimony followed on Wednesday, during which she sobbed on the stand and described in graphic detail the threatening phone calls and letters she has received following Giuliani’s lies about her. “I don’t have a name no more,” said Freeman, adding, “The only thing you have in your life is your name…my life is messed up.”

Moss and Freeman are seeking $15.5m to $43m in damages. In addition to compensatory damages, they are also seeking punitive damages against Giuliani.

Meanwhile, following Wednesday’s court hearing, Giuliani, who has remained defiant about his actions, tweeted, “Thank you to everyone who has reached out with support and encouragement… We will continue to tell the truth.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.