Rudy Giuliani, former New York Mayor, is facing a hefty penalty following a defamation verdict. The financial demands have raised questions regarding the source of funds for his lawyers and lifestyle. Indeed, it seems clear that he is receiving fiscal support from undisclosed sources as he continues to maintain his day-to-day expenditures, including travel.
His finances have been under scrutiny after he recently listed his $6 million New York apartment for sale. While this could provide some funds, it doesn't explain the entirety of his income. Giuliani also has a podcast, indicating another revenue stream, but it’s uncertain if it’s enough to cover his expenses and pay his legal bills.
Further complicating matters, Giuliani has struggled to manage payments to his own legal team, causing some of his lawyers to discontinue their services due to the remaining outstanding balance.
Besides these activities, Giuliani has made numerous trips to Mar-a-Lago, reportedly seeking the aid of former President Donald Trump and his extensive fundraising network.
Following the verdict that found Giuliani liable for defaming two Georgia election workers, Ruby Friedman and Shea Moss, there has been an immediate push by their respective attorneys to enforce the ruling. The jury ordered Giuliani to pay nearly $150 million – a sum far larger than the initial demand of $48 million by the plaintiffs.
However, it is possible that Giuliani could appeal, declare bankruptcy, or leverage other mechanisms to avoid these penalties; a strategy previously utilized by other figures in a similar situation.
Giuliani played a leading role in discrediting Friedman and Moss during the elections. The jury judged his allegations to be defamatory and held him responsible for causing substantial emotional distress to the mother and daughter duo. As a result, Giuliani has been ordered to pay $16.1 million for defamation to Friedman and $16.9 million to Moss, adding to $20 million each for emotional distress, totaling $72 million and an additional $75 million, bringing the grand total to approximately $148 million.
Regardless of his financial situation, the ruling represents a significant victory for the plaintiffs, reaffirming their right to work without dishonest and harmful allegations.
