A push to ban sugary drinks, candy, and more from the U.S. program that helps low-income families pay for nutritious food is gaining momentum with new Trump administration officials. The health and human services secretary and agriculture secretary have both expressed support for removing such items from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The health and human services secretary emphasized the need to stop using SNAP benefits to purchase 'soda or processed foods,' referring to them as 'poison.' The agriculture secretary echoed these sentiments, questioning the use of taxpayer money to provide unhealthy food to children in need of more nutritious options.
However, excluding specific foods from SNAP is a complex process as the program is governed by the USDA and administered at the state level. Any changes would require congressional approval or state waivers, which have historically been challenging to obtain.
Anti-hunger advocates argue that limiting food choices for SNAP recipients could undermine their autonomy and dignity. Research shows that SNAP users are not more likely than other low-income individuals to buy sugary drinks or snacks.
While bills are pending at both the federal and state levels to restrict SNAP benefits from covering soda, candy, and other items, challenges remain in defining which products would be prohibited. Some proposals allow certain beverages and snacks based on specific criteria, leading to debates over what constitutes 'healthy' choices.
Despite longstanding obstacles to changing the SNAP program, there is growing momentum behind efforts to improve nutrition and diet quality. Advocates hope that bipartisan support for promoting healthier food options will lead to meaningful reforms in the program.
