During the trial of a high-profile case, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass urged jurors not to believe the defense's argument that the defendant, Donald Trump, was too busy to be involved in the alleged misconduct. Steinglass emphasized that Trump had been in charge of his company for 40 years and was known for his hands-on approach to business operations.
The prosecutor highlighted Trump's meticulous attention to detail, stating that the former president was known to personally negotiate even the smallest expenses, such as the cost of light bulbs. Steinglass painted a picture of Trump as a highly involved leader who was deeply engaged in all aspects of his business.
By challenging the defense's portrayal of Trump as too preoccupied to be aware of any wrongdoing within his company, Steinglass aimed to undermine the credibility of the defense's argument. The prosecutor's remarks sought to establish Trump's close involvement in the day-to-day operations of his business empire, suggesting that he would have been well aware of any questionable activities taking place.
As the trial unfolds, the contrasting narratives presented by the prosecution and defense will be crucial in shaping the jurors' perception of the case. Steinglass's forceful assertion that Trump's business philosophy revolved around his direct engagement in all aspects of the company's operations serves as a key element in the prosecution's strategy to hold the defendant accountable.
