In the ongoing trial following the tragic shooting of Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film 'Rust', prosecutor Erlinda Johnson made a compelling statement to the jurors. She asserted that Alec Baldwin's claim of not pulling the trigger on the weapon after the incident was not possible based on the evidence.
According to Johnson, Baldwin's repeated assertion that he only pulled back the gun's hammer without actually pulling the trigger was refuted by the evidence presented in court. Baldwin maintained that he released the hammer without fully cocking the gun, leading to the fatal shooting of Hutchins.
The prosecution's argument raises questions about the sequence of events that led to the tragic incident. Baldwin's version of events, where he denies pulling the trigger but acknowledges manipulating the gun's hammer, is at the center of the trial.
The trial is expected to delve deeper into the technical aspects of the firearm involved in the shooting. Experts may be called upon to provide insights into the mechanics of the weapon and clarify whether it was indeed possible for the gun to discharge without Baldwin pulling the trigger.
As the legal proceedings continue, the case has garnered significant attention due to the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the broader implications for on-set safety protocols in the film industry. The outcome of the trial could have far-reaching consequences for the accountability of individuals in ensuring safety measures are strictly followed during film productions.
