During the jury selection process for the trial involving Michael Cohen, a potential juror was questioned by Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger regarding his ability to remain impartial despite having friends who have committed crimes. The juror expressed that while he may have friends who have engaged in criminal activities, he would not let that influence his judgment of Cohen's testimony.
When asked if hearing from a witness like Cohen, who has also committed crimes, would affect his ability to keep an open mind, the potential juror responded that he would listen to Cohen based on what he says without preconceived notions. He further emphasized his experience as a former corrections officer in New York City, stating that he has encountered various stories and would not be swayed by Cohen's criminal background.
Prosecutor Hoffinger probed the potential juror about his stance on Cohen potentially changing his story after pleading guilty. The juror maintained that his ability to remain impartial would not be compromised, citing his background in law enforcement as a factor in his ability to discern the truth amidst conflicting accounts.
The exchange between Prosecutor Hoffinger and the potential juror sheds light on the importance of impartiality and open-mindedness in the judicial process. Despite personal connections to individuals involved in criminal activities, the potential juror demonstrated a commitment to evaluating the evidence presented in the trial without bias.
