New Delhi: Centre informed Supreme Court that the petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage merely reflect urban elitist views and cannot be compared with the appropriate legislature which reflects the views and voices of a far wider spectrum and expands across the country.
The Centre's submission came in a fresh application before the Supreme on the issue pertaining to legal recognition of same-sex marriage and raised questions on the maintainability of the petitions as a preliminary issue saying that the prayers made would entail the judicial creation of a social institution called "marriage" of a different kind than contemplated under the existing law.
Various petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage will be heard by a five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court on April 18. Centre informed the apex court that any further creation of rights, recognition of relationships and giving legal sanctity to such relationships can be done only by the competent legislature and not by judicial adjudication.
Centre said that the petition seeking legal recognition of the same-sex marriage issue has far-reaching implications. Centre informed the Supreme Court that question concerning the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and its parity with the existing concept of marriage, as an exclusively heterogenous institution, which is governed by the existing legal regime and has a sanctity attached to it in every religion in the country, seriously affects the interests of every citizen. It raises critical issues as to whether questions of such a nature, which necessarily entail the creation of a new social institution, can be prayed for as a part of the process of judicial adjudication, Centre informed the Supreme Court.
Centre further informed the court that the petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage merely reflect urban elitist views and cannot be compared with the appropriate legislature which reflects the views and voices of a far wider spectrum and expands across the country.
Centre stated that the institution of marriage is a recognition of a social union of two people which will be conferred with a sanctity attached to the institution of marriage. It is submitted that any law recognizing persons' relationship and conferring legal sanctity thereupon, essentially involves a codification of societal ethos, cherished common values in the concept of family across religions in society and such other relevant factors, into legal norms, Centre further stated.
Centre said that the petitioners seeking recognition of same-sex marriage do not represent the view of the entire population of the nation.
"This would not in fact and cannot, in law, mean a majoritarian approach. This is the only constitutional approach permissible under the Constitution while recognizing any socio-legal relationship as an institution with sanction under the law. The competent legislature is the only constitutional organ which is aware of the above-referred considerations. The petitioners do not represent the view of the entire population of the nation," Centre further said.
Centre submitted that the question as to which social relationships will be recognised by the appropriate Legislature is part of the legislative policy to be decided by the representatives of the people as the representative of the people are the appropriate democratic institution to under Article 246 keeping in mind, among other things, the sanctity attached to the institution of marriage in the country, the societal ethos, cherished values in the concept of
family and other such relevant considerations.
Centre further added there is no denying that the Constitution provides for the power of judicial review. Still, judicial review should not become judicial legislation and the Personal Laws in India essentially represents a social concurrence by which certain norms have been crystallised into law.
Centre informed the apex court that judicial intervention to create this new institution of same-sex marriage risks upsetting this balance apart from being without jurisdiction. (ANI)
