Paul Watson, the iconic environmental activist and founder of the organisation Sea Shepherd, is no stranger to clashes with corporations and governments. Known for his bold and often controversial actions, he has dedicated his life to protecting marine wildlife, with Japanese whaling being one of his primary targets. Now, Watson faces a new legal battle: imprisoned in Greenland, he risks extradition to Japan. Japanese authorities accuse him of “conspiracy to board” their whaling vessel Shonan Maru 2 during two incidents in Antarctic waters in February 2010. One of his tactics involved deploying butyric acid stink bombs – symbolic but harmless acts intended to disrupt operations by emitting an unbearable stench.
In Japan, Watson’s actions are often seen as a provocative assault on a cultural tradition, a perspective highlighted by some European media outlets. However, this narrative overlooks the powerful industrial machinery behind Japanese whaling. While tradition plays a role, Japan’s whaling operations are also driven by a government-supported industrial complex. Watson’s current battle is not merely against what some view as a “barbaric” cultural practice but against a highly organised and politically protected system that has persisted for decades. To fully grasp what’s at stake for Watson, it’s essential to understand this industrial context.
The cultural and economic roots of Japanese whaling
Japan’s whaling tradition dates back centuries, originating in coastal communities that relied on whales for food and materials. However, these early practices were small-scale, vastly different from the industrialised operations Watson critiques today. In 2023 alone, Japan’s whaling fleet killed nearly 300 whales, with authorities setting a 2024 target of 200.
The notion of whaling as a cultural tradition took on new symbolism after World War II, when the Japanese government promoted whale meat consumption to address severe food shortages. It became a staple in school lunches, embedding itself in the national identity as a symbol of resilience during times of hardship.
A declining demand
Despite its historical roots, whale meat has lost its place in modern Japanese diets, particularly among younger generations. In 2023, consumption fell to just 2,000 tonnes, a stark contrast to the 200,000 tonnes consumed annually in the 1960s. Uses for whale byproducts, such as oil for candles or cosmetics, have also dwindled with the advent of petroleum substitutes.
Nevertheless, Japan’s government continues to defend whaling as an inalienable sovereign right, framing it as a cultural issue in defiance of the 1986 international moratorium on commercial whaling. This pits Japan’s claims of cultural preservation against global calls to ban whaling as incompatible with contemporary values.
[There are already more than 120,000 subscriptions to The Conversation newsletters. Subscribe today to better understand the world’s major issues.]
Defences of whaling as an expression of “cultural authenticity” – and not as a response to a domestic market that has all but collapsed – appear to be driven by powerful industrial and financial interests, weakening the cultural justification. Furthermore, the relentless industrialisation of Japan’s whaling practices has rendered comparisons to traditional methods obsolete. Unlike the small-scale, limited-impact techniques of the past, today’s operations occur on a vastly larger scale with far greater consequences for whale populations.
This shift fuels the debate between environmentalists and whaling proponents, raising questions about sustainability and the true motivations behind Japan’s insistence on maintaining the practice.
Targeting the “floating factories”
Japan’s whaling fleet is equipped with highly specialised vessels, some of which function as true “floating factories,” capable of capturing, processing and packaging whales directly at sea. This allows Japan to discreetly circumvent international regulations, because the whales are integrated into the supply chain before reaching land. Once ashore, whale meat is distributed through a network that extends to markets and restaurants across the country, including high-end establishments, thereby reinforcing the social acceptance of whaling. The government’s significant financial support for the whaling industry highlights the strong political and economic interests behind the practice.
It is true that “floating factories” are not a modern invention; they date back to the 19th century, when ships were equipped to process whale oil at sea. These vessels allowed whalers to immediately handle their catch, avoiding long and costly trips back to shore. Fitted with boilers and advanced cutting mechanisms for their time, these early floating factories made whale exploitation more efficient. A reading of Moby-Dick by Herman Melville vividly illustrates this reality. Today, Japan’s whaling practices undeniably continue this tradition, but with a dramatic shift in scale, driven by aggressive industrial and logistical optimisation.
For Watson and Sea Shepherd, confronting Japanese whaling is a daunting challenge. Operating as a nonprofit, Sea Shepherd lacks the financial and logistical resources of Japan’s state-backed whaling fleet. Instead, Watson has turned to direct-action campaigns, deploying aggressive tactics such as blocking harpoons, positioning ships between whalers and their prey and occasionally ramming whaling vessels. These actions aim to disrupt the industrial supply chain, delaying or halting operations without causing harm to human life.
Watson’s approach highlights the broader societal debate over the global responsibility to protect biodiversity and the limits of cultural relativism. While his actions have sparked controversy, they have also drawn attention to the vast industrial machinery sustaining Japan’s whaling operations.
The bigger picture
Watson’s fight transcends the immediate goal of disrupting whaling operations. It represents a clash between environmental preservation and deeply entrenched practices often defended on cultural grounds. Japan’s whaling industry, supported by powerful lobbying and government intervention, poses a formidable challenge to environmental activism.
As Watson remains imprisoned and faces potential extradition, the debate over his actions – and the future of Japan’s whaling practices – continues to unfold. Behind the cultural rhetoric lies a stark reality: industrial whaling is driven by economic and political interests that overshadow its purported traditional roots. The question remains whether such a system, so deeply embedded, can ever be fundamentally challenged.
Gilles Paché ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d'une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n'a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
