Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

Parents Not Liable For School Shooting, Jury Decides

Attorney Lori Laird, representing Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Marie Kosmetatos, parents of accused Santa Fe High School shooter Dimitrios Pagourtzis, looks through documents before closing arguments

A jury has ruled that the parents of Dimitrios Pagourtzis, the former student responsible for the 2018 shooting at Santa Fe High School near Houston, are not financially responsible for the tragic incident. The lawsuit, brought by victims and their families, aimed to hold the parents, Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Marie Kosmetatos, accountable for the shooting that claimed the lives of 10 individuals.

During the three-week trial, it was argued that the parents failed to provide adequate support for their son's mental health and did not take sufficient measures to prevent him from accessing their firearms. However, the jury placed the responsibility on Dimitrios Pagourtzis and a firearms ammunition retailer, awarding the families over $300 million in damages for pain and mental anguish.

Victims' families sought to hold parents responsible for the tragic incident.
The jury ruled parents not accountable for the shooting at Santa Fe High School.
Parents were accused of neglecting son's mental health and firearm access.
Jury placed responsibility on the shooter and a firearms retailer.
Families awarded over $300 million in damages for pain and mental anguish.

While the families' attorneys expressed disappointment with the verdict, they acknowledged that the parents were not found criminally liable. Pagourtzis, who is now 23 years old, has been charged with capital murder but was deemed incompetent to stand trial in 2019 and is currently held at a state mental health facility.

The jury also assigned some responsibility to an online retailer that sold ammunition to Pagourtzis without verifying his age, resulting in a settlement with the families. The retailer, Lucky Gunner, stated that it was not a party to the trial and therefore not accountable for the damages awarded.

Throughout the trial, conflicting testimonies emerged regarding the parents' awareness of their son's mental state and actions leading up to the shooting. While the families argued that red flags were present, the parents maintained that they were unaware of any concerning behavior.

The case underscores the complexities of addressing mental health issues and gun safety in the aftermath of mass shootings. The verdict serves as a reminder of the importance of ensuring the safety and well-being of children both at home and in educational settings.

Similar lawsuits have been filed following other tragic events, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding accountability and prevention measures in cases of mass violence.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.