Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
USA Today Sports Media Group
USA Today Sports Media Group
Sport
Anthony Rizzuti

Panthers HC Matt Rhule responds to criticism from ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky

Carolina Panthers head coach Matt Rhule isn’t going down without a fight—at least down to assertions that his team is laughably predictable.

On yesterday’s episode of NFL Live, former NFL quarterback and current ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky ripped apart the Carolina offense—even throwing around the terms “unacceptable” and “coaching malpractice.” While breaking down a few plays from the Panthers in Week 2, he claimed the unit was telegraphing their plays based off the positioning of running back Christian McCaffrey in shotgun formations.

Buy Panthers Tickets

Rhule responded to the criticism after Friday’s practice—stating that Orlovsky was, well, wrong.

“Yeah, I saw Dan’s thing,” Rhule said of the unflattering segment. “I’ve been around long enough. I’ve seen enough coaches get out there and say, ‘Every time they do this, they’re going to do this.’ And then it’s wrong. I disagree with it.

“For us, when we put Christian at depth, we are kinda getting into a run set. From that—we either run it, we zone read it, we RPO it, we run it to the left, we run it to the same side run. Our biggest pass play was from that backfield set, that we play action off of it. So if you tell me that we line up in a formation and we run it, we throw and we play action from there, it’s pretty balanced.”

Orlovsky noted that whenever McCaffrey was stationed behind quarterback Baker Mayfield, a run was coming. And whenever he was parallel to Mayfield, it’d be a pass.

But, uh, that wasn’t always the case last Sunday . . .

Well played, Rhule. Well played.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.