Only hours after King Charles III's proclamation, many headlines focused heavily on a surprise public appearance by Prince William and Prince Harry, who were joined by their wives Catherine and Meghan outside Windsor Castle.
It was the brothers' first public appearance together since the death of their grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II.
It was also the first time the two couples had been seen together since Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, made a highly publicised withdrawal from royal life.
So why did the appearance get so much attention? And how was the occasion treated in the tabloids?
What happened outside Windsor Castle?
The two couples were driven down from Windsor Castle to the castle gates on Saturday.
They disembarked two four-wheel drives and began walking together through the gates and out on to the road outside.
They walked as a group over to view floral tributes left outside the gates, before walking down the road, greeting cheering wellwishers who had gathered outside.
After about 40 minutes speaking with members of the public, the two couples then left in the same car, which was driven by William, Prince of Wales.
What's the media coverage of the appearance been like?
ABC royal commentator and editor-at-large of The Australian Women's Weekly Juliet Rieden described the appearance of the two brothers "reunited in grief" as "an historic moment".
"It took us all by surprise," she said.
"Certain corners of the media will always want to make this about the rift between the brothers, but this is about a family in grief and a nation in grief."
Rumours of a rift between the princes have rumbled since 2019, with speculation about tensions between the two intensifying after Harry and Meghan stepped down from royal duties the following year.
British tabloids, such as the Daily Mail, were quick to analyse Saturday's appearance in the context of the alleged rift, reading into the body language of the group.
"Lots of people make a lot of the body language between the couples. There are endless column inches wasted on that," Rieden said.
"But we can never know what's going on between these two.
"We can never know the pain between them."
Rieden said she believed many publications were missing the point of the appearance and not reading the mood of the public, who are "wanting to honour her majesty, of wanting to support the new King."
"The tabloid and social media coverage of the royal family over the last two years has been very toxic," she said.
"I think that the solemnity of this occasion, the outpouring of grief and emotion, and respect for her majesty is taking the media in Australia by surprise.
"Yes, the pomp and ceremony of yesterday and that which we will see over the coming days comes from another era, but I think that gives the royal family and the monarchy that majesty.
"The media can't take that away. It's absolutely mesmerising."
Why all the interest in the brothers instead of the King?
Senior lecturer in history at the University of Sydney Dr Cindy McCreery said the relative youth and celebrity appeal of William, Kate, Harry and Meghan was driving that interest.
"What you see with Harry and Meghan, but also to some extent with Kate and William, is the blurring of the lines between celebrity and royalty," she said.
"Whereas with Charles and the Queen it was very clear that they were famous but known as being royals, with the younger generation they have somehow transcended that distinction between being royal and being a celebrity.
"Meghan and Harry are particularly good examples of that crossover, in the sense they have particular appeal to people who may have no conscious interest in monarchy.
"And, of course, they are young and photogenic people, and people respond to that."
The King is also coming to the throne at a much later stage in his life than his predecessor, the Queen who took the throne at age of 25.
Dr McCreery said this could also be a factor in driving attention towards the younger generation of royals.
"Charles, in coming to the throne at the age of 73, will not have as long a reign as his mother and in that sense, people are almost kind of looking ahead to the next reign, which we know will be William and Kate," she said.
"And I think that's also perhaps quietly muffling some of the interest that a younger monarch may have."
What would have the King thought?
Rieden said she believed the appearance of the couples together would have been welcomed by the King, who she expects to open the monarchy up to the public more going forward.
"I don't think King Charles would have an issue with that at all," she said.
"In fact, I imagine he was behind the scenes hoping this would happen, and perhaps even advising William to invite his brother to be with him."
She also said it was not inconceivable that Harry and Meghan might return to royal work within the family in the future.
"King Charles has always left that door open for his son … I think that King Charles is taking the higher ground here, and showing the compassionate King he's going to be."
